HMAF.L vs. HTWN.L
HMAF.L (HSBC MSCI AC Far East ex Japan UCITS ETF USD) and HTWN.L (HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from HSBC - HMAF.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD while HTWN.L tracks the MSCI Taiwan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HMAF.L returned 12.09%/yr vs 23.33%/yr for HTWN.L. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HMAF.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HTWN.L.
Performance
HMAF.L vs. HTWN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HMAF.L is traded in GBP, while HTWN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the HTWN.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HMAF.L achieves a 36.25% return, which is significantly lower than HTWN.L's 67.79% return. Over the past 10 years, HMAF.L has underperformed HTWN.L with an annualized return of 12.09%, while HTWN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 23.33% annualized return.
HMAF.L
- 1D
- -2.32%
- 1M
- 8.81%
- YTD
- 36.25%
- 6M
- 39.16%
- 1Y
- 73.09%
- 3Y*
- 25.41%
- 5Y*
- 9.34%
- 10Y*
- 12.09%
HTWN.L
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 14.46%
- YTD
- 67.79%
- 6M
- 73.38%
- 1Y
- 117.71%
- 3Y*
- 41.27%
- 5Y*
- 23.42%
- 10Y*
- 23.33%
HMAF.L vs. HTWN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMAF.L HSBC MSCI AC Far East ex Japan UCITS ETF USD | 36.25% | 31.76% | 13.79% | -3.80% | -12.60% | -7.57% | 21.71% | 13.88% | -10.05% | 29.41% |
HTWN.L HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD | 67.79% | 23.15% | 27.50% | 21.28% | -20.57% | 29.44% | 31.41% | 29.56% | -2.68% | 15.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between HMAF.L and HTWN.L is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2013 | 0.53 |
Over the past year, HMAF.L and HTWN.L have become more correlated (0.80) than their long-term average of 0.53, meaning their price movements have been converging.
HMAF.L vs. HTWN.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HMAF.L
HTWN.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
HMAF.L
HTWN.L
Financial Services
HMAF.L
HTWN.L
Consumer Cyclical
HMAF.L
HTWN.L
Industrials
HMAF.L
HTWN.L
Communication Services
HMAF.L
HTWN.L
Basic Materials
HMAF.L
HTWN.L
Healthcare
HMAF.L
HTWN.L
Real Estate
HMAF.L
HTWN.L
-
Consumer Defensive
HMAF.L
HTWN.L
Energy
HMAF.L
HTWN.L
-
Utilities
HMAF.L
HTWN.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HMAF.L vs. HTWN.L — Risk / Return Rank
HMAF.L
HTWN.L
HMAF.L vs. HTWN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI AC Far East ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (HMAF.L) and HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (HTWN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HMAF.L | HTWN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.67 | 1.82 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.85 | 13.22 | -6.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.75 | 36.40 | -13.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HMAF.L | HTWN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.84 | 5.15 | -1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 1.15 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 1.43 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 1.12 | -0.58 |
Drawdowns
HMAF.L vs. HTWN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMAF.L drawdown since its inception was -39.58%, which is greater than HTWN.L's maximum drawdown of -31.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMAF.L and HTWN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMAF.L | HTWN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.58% | -31.84% | -7.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.62% | -8.86% | -1.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.52% | -29.76% | +10.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.30% | -29.97% | -4.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.58% | -29.97% | -9.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.05% | -2.08% | -0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.55% | -7.18% | -5.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 3.22% | -0.02% |
Volatility
HMAF.L vs. HTWN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC MSCI AC Far East ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (HMAF.L) is 8.65%, while HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (HTWN.L) has a volatility of 9.73%. This indicates that HMAF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTWN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HMAF.L | HTWN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.65% | 9.73% | -1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.96% | 18.35% | -2.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.95% | 22.75% | -3.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.03% | 20.88% | -1.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.99% | 23.42% | -4.43% |
HMAF.L vs. HTWN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HMAF.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than HTWN.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
HMAF.L vs. HTWN.L - Dividend Comparison
HMAF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HTWN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMAF.L HSBC MSCI AC Far East ex Japan UCITS ETF USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% |
HTWN.L HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD | 0.97% | 1.61% | 1.17% | 2.79% | 3.04% | 1.11% | 1.79% | 2.12% | 2.55% | 2.04% | 2.32% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HMAF.L and HTWN.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HMAF.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HMAF.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HTWN.L.
HMAF.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD, while HTWN.L tracks MSCI Taiwan NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for HMAF.L and 0.50% for HTWN.L.
Find the right allocation for HMAF.L and HTWN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer