HLXX vs. LRCU

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HLXX (Tradr 2X Long HL Daily ETF) and LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. HLXX is passively managed, while LRCU is actively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HLXX charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for LRCU.

Performance

HLXX vs. LRCU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long HL Daily ETF (HLXX) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

HLXX

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: -8.53%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LRCU

• 1D: -4.57%
• 1M: 43.52%
• YTD: 219.61%
• 6M: 274.49%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLXX vs. LRCU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
HLXX Tradr 2X Long HL Daily ETF	-21.23%
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	81.64%

Correlation

The correlation between HLXX and LRCU is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2026	0.58

Return for Risk

HLXX vs. LRCU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long HL Daily ETF (HLXX) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HLXX	LRCU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.56	12.64	-13.20

Drawdowns

HLXX vs. LRCU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLXX drawdown since its inception was -40.87%, roughly equal to the maximum LRCU drawdown of -40.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLXX and LRCU.

Drawdown Indicators

	HLXX	LRCU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.87%	-40.09%	-0.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.78%	-4.57%	-34.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.97%	-9.36%	-6.61%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HLXX	LRCU	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	125.85%	109.40%	+16.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	125.85%	109.40%	+16.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	125.85%	109.40%	+16.45%

HLXX vs. LRCU - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLXX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than LRCU's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

HLXX vs. LRCU - Dividend Comparison

Neither HLXX nor LRCU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HLXX and LRCU in my portfolio?

HLXX and LRCU have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HLXX or LRCU?

On fees, LRCU is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HLXX or LRCU?

LRCU is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for HLXX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HLXX or LRCU?

HLXX and LRCU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between HLXX and LRCU?

Their fees differ too: 1.49% for HLXX and 1.30% for LRCU.