HLQVX vs. YAFFX
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan Large Cap Value Fund (HLQVX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX).
HLQVX is managed by JPMorgan. It was launched on Mar 1, 1991. YAFFX is managed by AMG. It was launched on May 1, 1997.
Performance
HLQVX vs. YAFFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HLQVX vs. YAFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLQVX JPMorgan Large Cap Value Fund | -0.76% | 15.67% | 27.12% | 11.35% | -0.11% | 23.57% | 10.54% | 27.44% | -15.21% | 17.67% |
YAFFX AMG Yacktman Focused Fund | 10.26% | 3.89% | 9.30% | 16.53% | -8.20% | 16.48% | 17.22% | 19.21% | 2.99% | 20.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HLQVX achieves a -0.76% return, which is significantly lower than YAFFX's 10.26% return. Over the past 10 years, HLQVX has outperformed YAFFX with an annualized return of 12.91%, while YAFFX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.08% annualized return.
HLQVX
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- -5.48%
- YTD
- -0.76%
- 6M
- 2.72%
- 1Y
- 15.48%
- 3Y*
- 16.97%
- 5Y*
- 11.14%
- 10Y*
- 12.91%
YAFFX
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- -7.23%
- YTD
- 10.26%
- 6M
- 0.19%
- 1Y
- 12.84%
- 3Y*
- 12.23%
- 5Y*
- 7.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HLQVX vs. YAFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HLQVX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than YAFFX's 1.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HLQVX vs. YAFFX — Risk / Return Rank
HLQVX
YAFFX
HLQVX vs. YAFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Large Cap Value Fund (HLQVX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HLQVX | YAFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.92 | 0.58 | +0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.36 | 0.76 | +0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.18 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 0.65 | +0.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.16 | 2.29 | +2.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HLQVX | YAFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 0.58 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.42 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.68 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.59 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between HLQVX and YAFFX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HLQVX vs. YAFFX - Dividend Comparison
HLQVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.06%, while YAFFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLQVX JPMorgan Large Cap Value Fund | 8.06% | 8.05% | 20.76% | 5.44% | 5.80% | 8.22% | 1.05% | 1.38% | 9.09% | 9.21% | 5.91% | 14.85% |
YAFFX AMG Yacktman Focused Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 18.44% | 4.42% | 7.60% | 4.70% | 11.87% | 15.84% | 22.15% | 11.82% | 11.81% | 24.36% |
Drawdowns
HLQVX vs. YAFFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HLQVX drawdown since its inception was -60.03%, which is greater than YAFFX's maximum drawdown of -43.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLQVX and YAFFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HLQVX | YAFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.03% | -43.80% | -16.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.40% | -17.08% | +5.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.38% | -21.31% | +2.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.21% | -30.62% | -12.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.53% | -7.31% | -0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.43% | -6.24% | -3.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 4.85% | -1.73% |
Volatility
HLQVX vs. YAFFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Large Cap Value Fund (HLQVX) is 4.66%, while AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX) has a volatility of 8.00%. This indicates that HLQVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YAFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HLQVX | YAFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.66% | 8.00% | -3.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.77% | 21.56% | -11.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.56% | 22.92% | -6.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.47% | 17.86% | -1.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.42% | 16.40% | +4.02% |