PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLQVX vs. FLCOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HLQVX vs. FLCOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Large Cap Value Fund (HLQVX) and Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLQVX achieves a 7.01% return, which is significantly lower than FLCOX's 13.38% return.


HLQVX

1D
-0.13%
1M
2.93%
YTD
7.01%
6M
9.00%
1Y
24.71%
3Y*
20.33%
5Y*
11.36%
10Y*
13.43%

FLCOX

1D
-0.21%
1M
2.89%
YTD
13.38%
6M
14.97%
1Y
28.09%
3Y*
18.30%
5Y*
10.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLQVX vs. FLCOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HLQVX
JPMorgan Large Cap Value Fund
7.01%15.67%27.12%11.35%-0.11%23.57%10.54%27.44%-15.21%16.38%
FLCOX
Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund
13.38%15.90%14.38%11.48%-7.57%25.09%2.87%26.54%-8.38%10.90%

Correlation

The correlation between HLQVX and FLCOX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.95

The correlation between HLQVX and FLCOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HLQVX vs. FLCOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLQVX
HLQVX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
HLQVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLQVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLQVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
HLQVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLQVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCOX
FLCOX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FLCOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCOX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCOX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLQVX vs. FLCOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Large Cap Value Fund (HLQVX) and Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HLQVXFLCOXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.02

2.63

-0.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.87

3.73

-0.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.47

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

4.16

-1.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.67

17.51

-8.84

HLQVX vs. FLCOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLQVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the FLCOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLQVX and FLCOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HLQVXFLCOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

2.63

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.70

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.60

-0.14

Drawdowns

HLQVX vs. FLCOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLQVX drawdown since its inception was -60.03%, which is greater than FLCOX's maximum drawdown of -38.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLQVX and FLCOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLQVXFLCOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.03%

-38.28%

-21.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.31%

-6.80%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.11%

-15.60%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.38%

-19.00%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-0.34%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.40%

-4.45%

-4.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

1.62%

+1.16%

Volatility

HLQVX vs. FLCOX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Large Cap Value Fund (HLQVX) and Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX) have volatilities of 3.13% and 3.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLQVXFLCOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.13%

3.01%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.17%

8.14%

+1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.26%

10.80%

+1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.35%

14.83%

+1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.37%

17.64%

+2.73%

HLQVX vs. FLCOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLQVX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCOX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

HLQVX vs. FLCOX - Dividend Comparison

HLQVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.48%, more than FLCOX's 1.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLCOX
Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund
1.33%1.51%1.92%1.99%2.01%1.55%2.28%3.82%2.79%0.60%0.00%0.00%
HLQVX
JPMorgan Large Cap Value Fund
7.48%8.05%20.76%5.44%5.80%8.22%1.05%1.38%9.09%9.21%5.91%14.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, HLQVX and FLCOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HLQVX has higher volatility (3.13%) compared to FLCOX (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLQVX dropped -60.03% vs FLCOX's -38.28%.

FLCOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HLQVX and FLCOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer