PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLQVX vs. FAIRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HLQVX vs. FAIRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Large Cap Value Fund (HLQVX) and Fairholme Fund (FAIRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HLQVX having a 9.10% return and FAIRX slightly higher at 9.17%. Over the past 10 years, HLQVX has outperformed FAIRX with an annualized return of 13.86%, while FAIRX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.58% annualized return.


HLQVX

1D
1.01%
1M
4.19%
YTD
9.10%
6M
9.00%
1Y
24.65%
3Y*
20.00%
5Y*
13.34%
10Y*
13.86%

FAIRX

1D
2.89%
1M
1.98%
YTD
9.17%
6M
6.76%
1Y
34.39%
3Y*
14.19%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
9.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLQVX vs. FAIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HLQVX
JPMorgan Large Cap Value Fund
9.10%15.67%27.12%11.35%-0.11%23.57%10.54%27.44%-15.21%17.67%
FAIRX
Fairholme Fund
9.17%29.49%-17.44%46.72%-20.49%6.87%47.76%32.06%-23.18%-5.94%

Correlation

The correlation between HLQVX and FAIRX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 1999

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between HLQVX and FAIRX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HLQVX vs. FAIRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLQVX
HLQVX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
HLQVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLQVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLQVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
HLQVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLQVX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

FAIRX
FAIRX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
FAIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
FAIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLQVX vs. FAIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Large Cap Value Fund (HLQVX) and Fairholme Fund (FAIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HLQVXFAIRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.26

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

2.45

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.94

6.61

+2.33

HLQVX vs. FAIRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLQVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the FAIRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLQVX and FAIRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HLQVX vs. FAIRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLQVX drawdown since its inception was -60.03%, which is greater than FAIRX's maximum drawdown of -51.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLQVX and FAIRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLQVXFAIRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.03%

-51.28%

-8.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.31%

-13.96%

+4.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.11%

-27.95%

+11.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.38%

-41.50%

+23.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.21%

-41.50%

-1.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-8.09%

+7.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.38%

-11.59%

+2.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

5.17%

-2.38%

Volatility

HLQVX vs. FAIRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Large Cap Value Fund (HLQVX) is 4.67%, while Fairholme Fund (FAIRX) has a volatility of 4.96%. This indicates that HLQVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAIRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLQVXFAIRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

4.96%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.75%

17.65%

-7.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.82%

25.06%

-12.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.40%

26.28%

-9.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.39%

24.07%

-3.68%

HLQVX vs. FAIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLQVX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than FAIRX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

HLQVX vs. FAIRX - Dividend Comparison

HLQVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.33%, more than FAIRX's 0.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAIRX
Fairholme Fund
0.53%0.58%0.71%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.57%0.83%2.23%1.29%7.29%69.79%
HLQVX
JPMorgan Large Cap Value Fund
7.33%8.05%20.76%5.44%5.80%8.22%1.05%1.38%9.09%9.21%5.91%14.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


HLQVX and FAIRX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAIRX has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to HLQVX (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLQVX dropped -60.03% vs FAIRX's -51.28%.

HLQVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HLQVX and FAIRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer