HLPR.TO vs. HEWB.TO
HLPR.TO (Global X Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index Corporate Class ETF) and HEWB.TO (Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HLPR.TO is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the Solactive Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index, while HEWB.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HLPR.TO returned 7.17%/yr vs 18.20%/yr for HEWB.TO. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HLPR.TO charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for HEWB.TO.
Performance
HLPR.TO vs. HEWB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HLPR.TO achieves a 6.39% return, which is significantly lower than HEWB.TO's 19.10% return.
HLPR.TO
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 1.09%
- YTD
- 6.39%
- 6M
- 7.65%
- 1Y
- 19.36%
- 3Y*
- 19.73%
- 5Y*
- 7.17%
- 10Y*
- —
HEWB.TO
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 19.10%
- 6M
- 24.68%
- 1Y
- 59.97%
- 3Y*
- 32.65%
- 5Y*
- 18.20%
- 10Y*
- —
HLPR.TO vs. HEWB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLPR.TO Global X Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index Corporate Class ETF | 6.39% | 18.79% | 28.13% | 2.89% | -17.83% | 23.17% | 6.42% | 0.15% |
HEWB.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF | 19.10% | 43.48% | 24.54% | 11.00% | -10.46% | 39.19% | 4.74% | 3.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between HLPR.TO and HEWB.TO is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2019 | 0.31 |
The correlation between HLPR.TO and HEWB.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HLPR.TO vs. HEWB.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HLPR.TO
HEWB.TO
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
HLPR.TO
HEWB.TO
-
Basic Materials
HLPR.TO
-
HEWB.TO
-
Communication Services
HLPR.TO
-
HEWB.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
HLPR.TO
-
HEWB.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
HLPR.TO
-
HEWB.TO
-
Energy
HLPR.TO
-
HEWB.TO
-
Financial Services
HLPR.TO
-
HEWB.TO
Healthcare
HLPR.TO
-
HEWB.TO
-
Industrials
HLPR.TO
-
HEWB.TO
-
Technology
HLPR.TO
-
HEWB.TO
-
Utilities
HLPR.TO
-
HEWB.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HLPR.TO vs. HEWB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HLPR.TO
HEWB.TO
HLPR.TO vs. HEWB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index Corporate Class ETF (HLPR.TO) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF (HEWB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HLPR.TO | HEWB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.03 | 1.87 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.82 | 6.72 | +1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 46.33 | 30.62 | +15.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HLPR.TO | HEWB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.43 | 4.70 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 1.31 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.91 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
HLPR.TO vs. HEWB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HLPR.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.96%, roughly equal to the maximum HEWB.TO drawdown of -39.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLPR.TO and HEWB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HLPR.TO | HEWB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.96% | -39.43% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.49% | -8.97% | +6.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.09% | -14.84% | +4.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.79% | -25.89% | -0.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -1.98% | +1.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.58% | -7.27% | +0.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.42% | 1.96% | -1.54% |
Volatility
HLPR.TO vs. HEWB.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index Corporate Class ETF (HLPR.TO) is 1.04%, while Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF (HEWB.TO) has a volatility of 4.88%. This indicates that HLPR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HEWB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HLPR.TO | HEWB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.04% | 4.88% | -3.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.71% | 11.40% | -8.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.39% | 12.83% | -8.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.32% | 13.99% | -5.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.08% | 19.29% | -6.21% |
HLPR.TO vs. HEWB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HLPR.TO has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than HEWB.TO's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
HLPR.TO vs. HEWB.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither HLPR.TO nor HEWB.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
HLPR.TO and HEWB.TO have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HEWB.TO is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HEWB.TO is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for HLPR.TO.
HLPR.TO is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while HEWB.TO is Canada Equities. HLPR.TO tracks Solactive Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index, while HEWB.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HLPR.TO and 0.28% for HEWB.TO.
Find the right allocation for HLPR.TO and HEWB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer