PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLPR.TO vs. HEWB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HLPR.TO vs. HEWB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index Corporate Class ETF (HLPR.TO) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF (HEWB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLPR.TO achieves a 6.39% return, which is significantly lower than HEWB.TO's 19.10% return.


HLPR.TO

1D
-0.22%
1M
1.09%
YTD
6.39%
6M
7.65%
1Y
19.36%
3Y*
19.73%
5Y*
7.17%
10Y*

HEWB.TO

1D
-0.42%
1M
5.52%
YTD
19.10%
6M
24.68%
1Y
59.97%
3Y*
32.65%
5Y*
18.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLPR.TO vs. HEWB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HLPR.TO
Global X Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index Corporate Class ETF
6.39%18.79%28.13%2.89%-17.83%23.17%6.42%0.15%
HEWB.TO
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF
19.10%43.48%24.54%11.00%-10.46%39.19%4.74%3.66%

Correlation

The correlation between HLPR.TO and HEWB.TO is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2019

0.31

The correlation between HLPR.TO and HEWB.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HLPR.TO vs. HEWB.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HLPR.TO
HEWB.TO

Real Estate

47.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

100.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

HLPR.TO
47.2%
HEWB.TO

-

Basic Materials

HLPR.TO

-

HEWB.TO

-

Communication Services

HLPR.TO

-

HEWB.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

HLPR.TO

-

HEWB.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

HLPR.TO

-

HEWB.TO

-

Energy

HLPR.TO

-

HEWB.TO

-

Financial Services

HLPR.TO

-

HEWB.TO
100.0%

Healthcare

HLPR.TO

-

HEWB.TO

-

Industrials

HLPR.TO

-

HEWB.TO

-

Technology

HLPR.TO

-

HEWB.TO

-

Utilities

HLPR.TO

-

HEWB.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HLPR.TO vs. HEWB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLPR.TO
HLPR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
HLPR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLPR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLPR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
HLPR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLPR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

HEWB.TO
HEWB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
HEWB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEWB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEWB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
HEWB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEWB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLPR.TO vs. HEWB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index Corporate Class ETF (HLPR.TO) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF (HEWB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HLPR.TOHEWB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.03

1.87

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.82

6.72

+1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

46.33

30.62

+15.71

HLPR.TO vs. HEWB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLPR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.43, which is comparable to the HEWB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLPR.TO and HEWB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HLPR.TOHEWB.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.43

4.70

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

1.31

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.91

-0.25

Drawdowns

HLPR.TO vs. HEWB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLPR.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.96%, roughly equal to the maximum HEWB.TO drawdown of -39.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLPR.TO and HEWB.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLPR.TOHEWB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.96%

-39.43%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.49%

-8.97%

+6.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.09%

-14.84%

+4.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.79%

-25.89%

-0.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-1.98%

+1.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.58%

-7.27%

+0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.42%

1.96%

-1.54%

Volatility

HLPR.TO vs. HEWB.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index Corporate Class ETF (HLPR.TO) is 1.04%, while Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF (HEWB.TO) has a volatility of 4.88%. This indicates that HLPR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HEWB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLPR.TOHEWB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.04%

4.88%

-3.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.71%

11.40%

-8.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.39%

12.83%

-8.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.32%

13.99%

-5.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.08%

19.29%

-6.21%

HLPR.TO vs. HEWB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLPR.TO has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than HEWB.TO's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

HLPR.TO vs. HEWB.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither HLPR.TO nor HEWB.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HLPR.TO and HEWB.TO have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HEWB.TO is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HEWB.TO is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for HLPR.TO.

HLPR.TO is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while HEWB.TO is Canada Equities. HLPR.TO tracks Solactive Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index, while HEWB.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HLPR.TO and 0.28% for HEWB.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HLPR.TO and HEWB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer