PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HLPR.TO vs. BEPR.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HLPR.TO vs. BEPR.TO

Last updated Jul 17, 2026
Documentation

HLPR.TO (Global X Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index Corporate Class ETF) and BEPR.TO (Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Enhanced Investment Grade Preferred ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. HLPR.TO is passively managed, while BEPR.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HLPR.TO returned 7.66%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for BEPR.TO. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

HLPR.TO vs. BEPR.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index Corporate Class ETF (HLPR.TO) and Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Enhanced Investment Grade Preferred ETF (BEPR.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLPR.TO achieves a 8.14% return, which is significantly higher than BEPR.TO's -0.32% return.

HLPR.TO

1D
-0.22%
1M
1.76%
6M
7.48%
YTD
8.14%
1Y
16.28%
3Y*
19.66%
5Y*
7.66%
10Y*
—

BEPR.TO

1D
-0.58%
1M
-0.23%
6M
-0.32%
YTD
-0.32%
1Y
4.18%
3Y*
9.96%
5Y*
1.35%
10Y*
4.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLPR.TO vs. BEPR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HLPR.TO
Global X Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index Corporate Class ETF		8.14%18.79%28.13%2.89%-17.83%23.17%6.42%0.80%
BEPR.TO
Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Enhanced Investment Grade Preferred ETF		-0.32%6.68%14.36%6.62%-19.22%8.37%0.94%19.52%

Correlation

The correlation between HLPR.TO and BEPR.TO is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2019

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index Corporate Class ETF

Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Enhanced Investment Grade Preferred ETF

Often compared with HLPR.TO:
HLPR.TO vs. ZPR.TOHLPR.TO vs. HPR.TOHLPR.TO vs. TPRF.TOHLPR.TO vs. CPD.TOHLPR.TO vs. SPLT.TOHLPR.TO vs. XPF.TOHLPR.TO vs. RPF.TO
Often compared with BEPR.TO:
BEPR.TO vs. BLOV.TOBEPR.TO vs. BDIV.TOBEPR.TO vs. BFIN.TOBEPR.TO vs. BGIE.TOBEPR.TO vs. BPRF.TOBEPR.TO vs. EDGF.TOBEPR.TO vs. KNGC.TO

Return for Risk

HLPR.TO vs. BEPR.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HLPR.TO
HLPR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
HLPR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLPR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLPR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
HLPR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLPR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
BEPR.TO
BEPR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
BEPR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BEPR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
BEPR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BEPR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
BEPR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLPR.TO vs. BEPR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index Corporate Class ETF (HLPR.TO) and Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Enhanced Investment Grade Preferred ETF (BEPR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

HLPR.TOBEPR.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
3.75
0.51

+3.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
5.26
0.79

+4.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.81

1.10

+0.72

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.58

0.87

+5.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

37.60

2.83

+34.78

HLPR.TO vs. BEPR.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLPR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.75, which is higher than the BEPR.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLPR.TO and BEPR.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HLPR.TO vs. BEPR.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLPR.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.96%, smaller than the maximum BEPR.TO drawdown of -69.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLPR.TO and BEPR.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HLPR.TOBEPR.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.96%

-69.85%

+30.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.49%

-4.84%

+2.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.88%

-6.15%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.79%

-27.03%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-51.41%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-1.55%

+1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.47%

-12.44%

+5.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.43%

1.48%

-1.05%

Volatility

HLPR.TO vs. BEPR.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index Corporate Class ETF (HLPR.TO) is 1.17%, while Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Enhanced Investment Grade Preferred ETF (BEPR.TO) has a volatility of 1.98%. This indicates that HLPR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BEPR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HLPR.TOBEPR.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.17%

1.98%

-0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.88%

6.58%

-3.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.37%

8.15%

-3.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.35%

11.70%

-3.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.00%

16.10%

-3.10%

Dividends

HLPR.TO vs. BEPR.TO - Dividend Comparison

HLPR.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BEPR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.00%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BEPR.TO
Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Enhanced Investment Grade Preferred ETF		9.00%9.28%9.19%9.58%9.26%6.87%6.37%6.70%9.17%7.43%8.31%9.40%
HLPR.TO
Global X Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index Corporate Class ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

HLPR.TO and BEPR.TO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Brompton.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HLPR.TO and BEPR.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer