PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLMSX vs. IEGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HLMSX vs. IEGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio (HLMSX) and Invesco EQV International Small Company Fund (IEGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLMSX achieves a 7.05% return, which is significantly lower than IEGAX's 11.06% return. Over the past 10 years, HLMSX has underperformed IEGAX with an annualized return of 6.07%, while IEGAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.58% annualized return.


HLMSX

1D
-0.26%
1M
3.52%
YTD
7.05%
6M
9.40%
1Y
7.54%
3Y*
6.66%
5Y*
0.39%
10Y*
6.07%

IEGAX

1D
-0.68%
1M
2.00%
YTD
11.06%
6M
13.35%
1Y
17.06%
3Y*
14.22%
5Y*
7.09%
10Y*
8.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLMSX vs. IEGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HLMSX
Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio
7.05%14.87%-6.92%11.78%-24.50%12.82%18.51%29.45%-17.65%34.42%
IEGAX
Invesco EQV International Small Company Fund
11.06%25.92%-2.63%14.10%-11.28%18.40%10.18%18.54%-18.70%33.43%

Correlation

The correlation between HLMSX and IEGAX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2007

0.82

The correlation between HLMSX and IEGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HLMSX vs. IEGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLMSX
HLMSX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
HLMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
HLMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

IEGAX
IEGAX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
IEGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
IEGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLMSX vs. IEGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio (HLMSX) and Invesco EQV International Small Company Fund (IEGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HLMSXIEGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.21

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

1.32

-0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.66

5.02

-3.36

HLMSX vs. IEGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLMSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the IEGAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLMSX and IEGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HLMSXIEGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

1.11

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.54

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.61

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.55

-0.19

Drawdowns

HLMSX vs. IEGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLMSX drawdown since its inception was -60.77%, smaller than the maximum IEGAX drawdown of -65.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLMSX and IEGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLMSXIEGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.77%

-65.36%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.59%

-12.41%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.57%

-12.41%

-4.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.22%

-23.64%

-14.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.22%

-43.09%

+4.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.62%

-1.47%

-7.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.22%

-13.24%

+0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.25%

3.25%

+1.00%

Volatility

HLMSX vs. IEGAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio (HLMSX) is 3.33%, while Invesco EQV International Small Company Fund (IEGAX) has a volatility of 4.18%. This indicates that HLMSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLMSXIEGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

4.18%

-0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.66%

12.10%

-2.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.22%

14.81%

-2.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.04%

13.34%

+1.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.97%

14.12%

+0.85%

HLMSX vs. IEGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLMSX has a 1.37% expense ratio, which is lower than IEGAX's 1.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

HLMSX vs. IEGAX - Dividend Comparison

HLMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, less than IEGAX's 12.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HLMSX
Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio
3.77%4.04%1.17%1.00%1.83%2.82%0.03%0.52%7.56%1.13%4.37%1.54%
IEGAX
Invesco EQV International Small Company Fund
12.56%13.95%3.17%2.26%2.98%4.22%1.11%4.55%3.87%6.32%6.29%8.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


HLMSX and IEGAX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEGAX has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to HLMSX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLMSX dropped -60.77% vs IEGAX's -65.36%.

IEGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HLMSX and IEGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer