PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLMSX vs. HWTIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HLMSX vs. HWTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio (HLMSX) and Hotchkis & Wiley International Small Cap Diversified Value Fund (HWTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLMSX achieves a 7.71% return, which is significantly lower than HWTIX's 15.58% return.


HLMSX

1D
-0.66%
1M
0.88%
6M
5.11%
YTD
7.71%
1Y
6.78%
3Y*
5.55%
5Y*
-0.29%
10Y*
6.10%
ALL TIME*
5.59%

HWTIX

1D
-1.02%
1M
4.75%
6M
9.80%
YTD
15.58%
1Y
26.65%
3Y*
19.00%
5Y*
11.92%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

HLMSX vs. HWTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HLMSX
Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio
7.71%14.87%-6.92%11.78%-24.50%12.82%29.80%
HWTIX
Hotchkis & Wiley International Small Cap Diversified Value Fund
15.58%30.96%4.62%20.79%-8.67%16.22%34.26%

Correlation

The correlation between HLMSX and HWTIX is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2020

0.84

The correlation between HLMSX and HWTIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HLMSX vs. HWTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HLMSX
HLMSX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
HLMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
HLMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

HWTIX
HWTIX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
HWTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
HWTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HLMSX vs. HWTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio (HLMSX) and Hotchkis & Wiley International Small Cap Diversified Value Fund (HWTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HLMSXHWTIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.39

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

2.57

-1.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.65

9.31

-7.67

HLMSX vs. HWTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLMSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the HWTIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLMSX and HWTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HLMSX vs. HWTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLMSX drawdown since its inception was -60.77%, which is greater than HWTIX's maximum drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLMSX and HWTIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLMSXHWTIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.77%

-29.57%

-31.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.59%

-10.75%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.57%

-29.57%

+13.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.22%

-29.57%

-8.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.06%

-1.02%

-7.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.19%

-6.20%

-6.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.16%

2.97%

+1.19%

Volatility

HLMSX vs. HWTIX - Volatility Comparison

Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio (HLMSX) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to Hotchkis & Wiley International Small Cap Diversified Value Fund (HWTIX) at 3.57%. This indicates that HLMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLMSXHWTIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

3.57%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.56%

10.39%

+0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.62%

12.87%

-0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.14%

22.89%

-7.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.82%

21.78%

-6.96%

HLMSX vs. HWTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLMSX has a 1.37% expense ratio, which is higher than HWTIX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

HLMSX vs. HWTIX - Dividend Comparison

HLMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, less than HWTIX's 12.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HLMSX
Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio
3.75%4.04%1.17%1.00%1.83%2.82%0.03%0.52%7.56%1.13%4.37%1.54%
HWTIX
Hotchkis & Wiley International Small Cap Diversified Value Fund
12.11%4.68%31.95%6.64%5.32%22.94%4.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HLMSX and HWTIX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HLMSX has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to HWTIX (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLMSX dropped -60.77% vs HWTIX's -29.57%.

HWTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HLMSX and HWTIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer