PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLMGX vs. VMNVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HLMGX vs. VMNVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harding Loevner Global Equity Portfolio (HLMGX) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Admiral Shares (VMNVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLMGX achieves a 6.56% return, which is significantly lower than VMNVX's 8.44% return. Over the past 10 years, HLMGX has outperformed VMNVX with an annualized return of 10.35%, while VMNVX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.74% annualized return.


HLMGX

1D
0.45%
1M
4.44%
YTD
6.56%
6M
6.47%
1Y
14.00%
3Y*
14.14%
5Y*
4.23%
10Y*
10.35%

VMNVX

1D
0.00%
1M
2.49%
YTD
8.44%
6M
8.97%
1Y
13.19%
3Y*
13.68%
5Y*
9.29%
10Y*
8.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLMGX vs. VMNVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HLMGX
Harding Loevner Global Equity Portfolio
6.56%11.95%13.50%21.84%-30.20%14.38%29.68%28.77%-10.61%31.94%
VMNVX
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Admiral Shares
8.44%12.83%13.42%7.94%-4.46%15.40%-3.94%22.66%-1.70%16.03%

Correlation

The correlation between HLMGX and VMNVX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2013

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between HLMGX and VMNVX has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HLMGX vs. VMNVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLMGX
HLMGX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
HLMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
HLMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

VMNVX
VMNVX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
VMNVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMNVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMNVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
VMNVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMNVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLMGX vs. VMNVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harding Loevner Global Equity Portfolio (HLMGX) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Admiral Shares (VMNVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HLMGXVMNVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.09

1.92

-0.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.57

2.76

-1.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.34

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

2.10

-0.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.98

8.20

-3.21

HLMGX vs. VMNVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLMGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the VMNVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLMGX and VMNVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HLMGXVMNVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

1.92

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.98

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.73

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.80

-0.44

Drawdowns

HLMGX vs. VMNVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLMGX drawdown since its inception was -54.27%, which is greater than VMNVX's maximum drawdown of -33.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLMGX and VMNVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLMGXVMNVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.27%

-33.11%

-21.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.28%

-6.24%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.76%

-7.93%

-7.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.48%

-12.93%

-25.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.48%

-33.11%

-5.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.18%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.97%

-2.81%

-10.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

1.60%

+1.19%

Volatility

HLMGX vs. VMNVX - Volatility Comparison

Harding Loevner Global Equity Portfolio (HLMGX) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Admiral Shares (VMNVX) at 1.95%. This indicates that HLMGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMNVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLMGXVMNVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

1.95%

+1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.17%

5.17%

+5.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.84%

6.83%

+6.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.24%

9.53%

+8.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.11%

11.96%

+6.15%

HLMGX vs. VMNVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLMGX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VMNVX's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

HLMGX vs. VMNVX - Dividend Comparison

HLMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.70%, more than VMNVX's 9.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HLMGX
Harding Loevner Global Equity Portfolio
19.70%20.99%30.72%0.28%0.00%16.22%5.68%0.27%12.74%13.71%1.34%2.81%
VMNVX
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Admiral Shares
9.28%10.07%3.84%3.13%5.03%6.33%2.15%4.62%7.37%2.31%2.82%3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


HLMGX and VMNVX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HLMGX has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to VMNVX (1.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLMGX dropped -54.27% vs VMNVX's -33.11%.

VMNVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HLMGX and VMNVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer