PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLMA.L vs. SCHN.SW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HLMA.L vs. SCHN.SW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Halma plc (HLMA.L) and Schindler Holding AG (SCHN.SW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HLMA.L is traded in GBp, while SCHN.SW is traded in CHF. To make them comparable, the SCHN.SW values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLMA.L achieves a 33.47% return, which is significantly higher than SCHN.SW's -6.41% return. Over the past 10 years, HLMA.L has outperformed SCHN.SW with an annualized return of 18.37%, while SCHN.SW has yielded a comparatively lower 7.93% annualized return.


HLMA.L

1D
1.24%
1M
3.80%
YTD
33.47%
6M
29.66%
1Y
59.70%
3Y*
26.08%
5Y*
12.90%
10Y*
18.37%

SCHN.SW

1D
1.52%
1M
-0.49%
YTD
-6.41%
6M
-3.45%
1Y
-4.93%
3Y*
15.11%
5Y*
5.04%
10Y*
7.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLMA.L vs. SCHN.SW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HLMA.L
Halma plc
33.47%32.52%18.70%16.78%-37.74%31.48%16.58%56.35%9.47%42.10%
SCHN.SW
Schindler Holding AG
-6.41%23.67%17.68%27.48%-23.22%1.32%8.57%24.93%-7.13%19.64%

Correlation

The correlation between HLMA.L and SCHN.SW is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2007

0.37

The correlation between HLMA.L and SCHN.SW shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.42 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HLMA.L vs. SCHN.SW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLMA.L
HLMA.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HLMA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLMA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLMA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
HLMA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLMA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHN.SW
SCHN.SW Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
SCHN.SW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHN.SW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHN.SW Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHN.SW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHN.SW Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLMA.L vs. SCHN.SW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Halma plc (HLMA.L) and Schindler Holding AG (SCHN.SW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HLMA.LSCHN.SWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

0.98

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.39

-0.27

+4.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.18

-0.57

+17.75

HLMA.L vs. SCHN.SW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLMA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the SCHN.SW Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLMA.L and SCHN.SW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HLMA.LSCHN.SWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

-0.22

+2.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.22

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.37

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.56

+0.15

Drawdowns

HLMA.L vs. SCHN.SW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLMA.L drawdown since its inception was -42.86%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHN.SW drawdown of -41.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLMA.L and SCHN.SW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLMA.LSCHN.SWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.86%

-41.70%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.53%

-15.95%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.75%

-16.82%

-8.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.86%

-41.70%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.86%

-41.70%

-1.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.20%

-12.71%

+9.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.17%

-9.12%

-1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

7.41%

-3.95%

Volatility

HLMA.L vs. SCHN.SW - Volatility Comparison

Halma plc (HLMA.L) has a higher volatility of 8.81% compared to Schindler Holding AG (SCHN.SW) at 5.80%. This indicates that HLMA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHN.SW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLMA.LSCHN.SWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.81%

5.80%

+3.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.91%

16.70%

+3.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.85%

19.62%

+5.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.91%

22.52%

+3.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.72%

21.78%

+2.94%

Dividends

HLMA.L vs. SCHN.SW - Dividend Comparison

HLMA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than SCHN.SW's 2.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HLMA.L
Halma plc
0.50%0.67%0.83%0.91%0.98%0.57%0.69%0.76%1.11%1.12%0.00%0.00%
SCHN.SW
Schindler Holding AG
2.35%2.13%0.40%2.01%2.40%1.64%1.68%1.69%2.10%0.91%1.52%1.30%

Financials

HLMA.L vs. SCHN.SW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Halma plc and Schindler Holding AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. HLMA.L values in GBp, SCHN.SW values in CHF

Frequently Asked Questions


HLMA.L and SCHN.SW have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HLMA.L and SCHN.SW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer