PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HLMA.L vs. CGEO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

HLMA.L vs. CGEO.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Halma plc (HLMA.L) and Georgia Capital plc (CGEO.L).

Performance

HLMA.L vs. CGEO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Halma plc (HLMA.L) and Georgia Capital plc (CGEO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HLMA.L vs. CGEO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HLMA.L
Halma plc		8.93%32.52%18.70%16.78%-37.74%31.48%16.58%56.35%2.40%
CGEO.L
Georgia Capital plc		23.06%158.33%17.42%40.00%2.38%32.04%-41.43%-9.70%-8.32%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HLMA.L:

£14.60B

CGEO.L:

£1.34B

EPS

HLMA.L:

£1.46

CGEO.L:

£34.15

PE Ratio

HLMA.L:

26.39

CGEO.L:

1.12

PEG Ratio

HLMA.L:

2.54

CGEO.L:

2.79

PS Ratio

HLMA.L:

3.67

CGEO.L:

1.12

PB Ratio

HLMA.L:

7.35

CGEO.L:

0.30

Total Revenue (TTM)

HLMA.L:

£3.98B

CGEO.L:

£1.20B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HLMA.L:

£1.17B

CGEO.L:

£1.19B

EBITDA (TTM)

HLMA.L:

£936.80M

CGEO.L:

£0.00

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLMA.L achieves a 8.93% return, which is significantly lower than CGEO.L's 23.06% return.

HLMA.L

1D
1.37%
1M
-6.50%
YTD
8.93%
6M
11.69%
1Y
47.48%
3Y*
21.01%
5Y*
10.47%
10Y*
16.57%

CGEO.L

1D
5.10%
1M
2.97%
YTD
23.06%
6M
63.03%
1Y
142.99%
3Y*
69.39%
5Y*
44.81%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Halma plc

Georgia Capital plc

Often compared with HLMA.L:
HLMA.L vs. MSI.LHLMA.L vs. QQQHLMA.L vs. RMS.PAHLMA.L vs. HMWO.LHLMA.L vs. VOO
Often compared with CGEO.L:
CGEO.L vs. PRXCXCGEO.L vs. SGOV

Return for Risk

HLMA.L vs. CGEO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HLMA.L
HLMA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
HLMA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLMA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLMA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
HLMA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLMA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
CGEO.L
CGEO.L Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
CGEO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGEO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGEO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CGEO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGEO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLMA.L vs. CGEO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Halma plc (HLMA.L) and Georgia Capital plc (CGEO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

HLMA.LCGEO.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.97

4.12

-2.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.79

4.25

-1.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.61

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

7.50

-4.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.78

36.70

-22.92

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HLMA.L vs. CGEO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLMA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is lower than the CGEO.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLMA.L and CGEO.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

HLMA.LCGEO.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

4.12

-2.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

1.43

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.48

+0.13

Correlation

The correlation between HLMA.L and CGEO.L is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

HLMA.L vs. CGEO.L - Dividend Comparison

HLMA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, while CGEO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HLMA.L
Halma plc		0.62%0.67%0.83%0.91%0.98%0.57%0.69%0.76%1.11%1.12%1.47%1.42%
CGEO.L
Georgia Capital plc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HLMA.L vs. CGEO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLMA.L drawdown since its inception was -43.68%, smaller than the maximum CGEO.L drawdown of -72.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLMA.L and CGEO.L.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

HLMA.LCGEO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.68%

-72.62%

+28.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.53%

-21.17%

+7.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.86%

-39.08%

-3.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.86%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.89%

0.00%

-7.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.24%

-30.74%

+19.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

3.91%

-0.54%

Volatility

HLMA.L vs. CGEO.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Halma plc (HLMA.L) is 8.93%, while Georgia Capital plc (CGEO.L) has a volatility of 9.95%. This indicates that HLMA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGEO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

HLMA.LCGEO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.93%

9.95%

-1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.16%

20.31%

-2.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.01%

34.52%

-10.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.32%

31.23%

-5.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.36%

35.09%

-10.73%

Financials

HLMA.L vs. CGEO.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Halma plc and Georgia Capital plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJuly
1.24B
982.58M
(HLMA.L) Total Revenue
(CGEO.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBp except per share items