HLIPX vs. MCFIX
HLIPX (JPMorgan Core Plus Bond Fund) and MCFIX (Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, HLIPX returned 0.89%/yr vs -0.03%/yr for MCFIX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HLIPX charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for MCFIX.
Performance
HLIPX vs. MCFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HLIPX achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly higher than MCFIX's -1.10% return.
HLIPX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 5.96%
- 3Y*
- 4.89%
- 5Y*
- 0.89%
- 10Y*
- 2.33%
MCFIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- -1.10%
- 6M
- -1.02%
- 1Y
- 3.23%
- 3Y*
- 3.77%
- 5Y*
- -0.03%
- 10Y*
- —
HLIPX vs. MCFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLIPX JPMorgan Core Plus Bond Fund | 0.44% | 7.98% | 2.64% | 6.38% | -12.69% | -0.30% | 7.93% | 5.52% |
MCFIX Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund | -1.10% | 6.64% | 2.02% | 6.47% | -13.69% | -1.05% | 4.75% | 3.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between HLIPX and MCFIX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2019 | 0.90 |
The correlation between HLIPX and MCFIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.93 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HLIPX vs. MCFIX — Risk / Return Rank
HLIPX
MCFIX
HLIPX vs. MCFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Core Plus Bond Fund (HLIPX) and Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HLIPX | MCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.16 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | 0.98 | +0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.99 | 2.80 | +3.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HLIPX | MCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 0.89 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | -0.00 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 0.14 | +0.97 |
Drawdowns
HLIPX vs. MCFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HLIPX drawdown since its inception was -16.91%, smaller than the maximum MCFIX drawdown of -21.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLIPX and MCFIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HLIPX | MCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.91% | -21.68% | +4.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.05% | -3.75% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.08% | -6.32% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.91% | -18.72% | +1.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.69% | -6.08% | +4.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.94% | -8.54% | +6.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.00% | 1.27% | -0.27% |
Volatility
HLIPX vs. MCFIX - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Core Plus Bond Fund (HLIPX) and Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX) have volatilities of 1.29% and 1.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HLIPX | MCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.29% | 1.32% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.80% | 2.77% | +0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.88% | 4.12% | -0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.68% | 6.04% | -0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.64% | 6.12% | -1.48% |
HLIPX vs. MCFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HLIPX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than MCFIX's 0.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
HLIPX vs. MCFIX - Dividend Comparison
HLIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, more than MCFIX's 4.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLIPX JPMorgan Core Plus Bond Fund | 4.58% | 4.86% | 4.88% | 4.02% | 3.36% | 3.25% | 4.36% | 3.23% | 3.08% | 2.83% | 2.77% | 3.25% |
MCFIX Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund | 4.31% | 3.89% | 4.54% | 3.68% | 3.31% | 2.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HLIPX and MCFIX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MCFIX has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to HLIPX (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLIPX dropped -16.91% vs MCFIX's -21.68%.
HLIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HLIPX and MCFIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer