PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLIPX vs. MCFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HLIPX vs. MCFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Core Plus Bond Fund (HLIPX) and Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLIPX achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly higher than MCFIX's -1.10% return.


HLIPX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.42%
YTD
0.44%
6M
0.32%
1Y
5.96%
3Y*
4.89%
5Y*
0.89%
10Y*
2.33%

MCFIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.11%
YTD
-1.10%
6M
-1.02%
1Y
3.23%
3Y*
3.77%
5Y*
-0.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLIPX vs. MCFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HLIPX
JPMorgan Core Plus Bond Fund
0.44%7.98%2.64%6.38%-12.69%-0.30%7.93%5.52%
MCFIX
Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund
-1.10%6.64%2.02%6.47%-13.69%-1.05%4.75%3.31%

Correlation

The correlation between HLIPX and MCFIX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2019

0.90

The correlation between HLIPX and MCFIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.93 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HLIPX vs. MCFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLIPX
HLIPX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
HLIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
HLIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

MCFIX
MCFIX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
MCFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MCFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLIPX vs. MCFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Core Plus Bond Fund (HLIPX) and Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HLIPXMCFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.16

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

0.98

+0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.99

2.80

+3.19

HLIPX vs. MCFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLIPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the MCFIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLIPX and MCFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HLIPXMCFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

0.89

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

-0.00

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

0.14

+0.97

Drawdowns

HLIPX vs. MCFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLIPX drawdown since its inception was -16.91%, smaller than the maximum MCFIX drawdown of -21.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLIPX and MCFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLIPXMCFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.91%

-21.68%

+4.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.05%

-3.75%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.08%

-6.32%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.91%

-18.72%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.69%

-6.08%

+4.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.94%

-8.54%

+6.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

1.27%

-0.27%

Volatility

HLIPX vs. MCFIX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Core Plus Bond Fund (HLIPX) and Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX) have volatilities of 1.29% and 1.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLIPXMCFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.29%

1.32%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.80%

2.77%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.88%

4.12%

-0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.68%

6.04%

-0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.64%

6.12%

-1.48%

HLIPX vs. MCFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLIPX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than MCFIX's 0.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

HLIPX vs. MCFIX - Dividend Comparison

HLIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, more than MCFIX's 4.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HLIPX
JPMorgan Core Plus Bond Fund
4.58%4.86%4.88%4.02%3.36%3.25%4.36%3.23%3.08%2.83%2.77%3.25%
MCFIX
Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund
4.31%3.89%4.54%3.68%3.31%2.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HLIPX and MCFIX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MCFIX has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to HLIPX (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLIPX dropped -16.91% vs MCFIX's -21.68%.

HLIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HLIPX and MCFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer