PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLIEX vs. REAYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HLIEX vs. REAYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Equity Income Fund (HLIEX) and Russell Investments Equity Income Fund (REAYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLIEX achieves a 16.66% return, which is significantly lower than REAYX's 17.91% return.


HLIEX

1D
0.81%
1M
1.62%
6M
11.61%
YTD
16.66%
1Y
26.84%
3Y*
17.67%
5Y*
11.87%
10Y*
12.46%
ALL TIME*
9.24%

REAYX

1D
0.34%
1M
2.58%
6M
13.23%
YTD
17.91%
1Y
27.93%
3Y*
16.02%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

HLIEX vs. REAYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HLIEX
JPMorgan Equity Income Fund
16.66%14.67%19.67%4.79%-1.88%25.10%3.61%26.30%-4.45%12.66%
REAYX
Russell Investments Equity Income Fund
17.91%14.66%11.90%12.50%-8.86%27.01%9.06%29.57%-8.60%13.19%

Correlation

The correlation between HLIEX and REAYX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2017

0.94

The correlation between HLIEX and REAYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HLIEX vs. REAYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HLIEX
HLIEX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
HLIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
HLIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

REAYX
REAYX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
REAYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REAYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
REAYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
REAYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
REAYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HLIEX vs. REAYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Equity Income Fund (HLIEX) and Russell Investments Equity Income Fund (REAYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HLIEXREAYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.46

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

4.04

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.06

15.85

-1.79

HLIEX vs. REAYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLIEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the REAYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLIEX and REAYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HLIEX vs. REAYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLIEX drawdown since its inception was -50.33%, which is greater than REAYX's maximum drawdown of -36.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLIEX and REAYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLIEXREAYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.33%

-36.87%

-13.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.08%

-6.66%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.19%

-20.66%

+6.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.85%

-20.66%

+5.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.34%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.34%

-4.85%

-1.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

1.69%

+0.13%

Volatility

HLIEX vs. REAYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Equity Income Fund (HLIEX) is 2.83%, while Russell Investments Equity Income Fund (REAYX) has a volatility of 3.02%. This indicates that HLIEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REAYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLIEXREAYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

3.02%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.95%

7.84%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.61%

10.44%

+0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.24%

16.73%

-2.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.76%

18.45%

-1.69%

HLIEX vs. REAYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLIEX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than REAYX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

HLIEX vs. REAYX - Dividend Comparison

HLIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.23%, less than REAYX's 12.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HLIEX
JPMorgan Equity Income Fund
9.23%10.81%14.41%2.77%3.67%3.33%1.82%2.78%5.12%2.47%2.45%2.73%
REAYX
Russell Investments Equity Income Fund
12.80%15.24%15.38%13.55%19.72%10.47%3.61%1.86%45.26%14.47%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, HLIEX and REAYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

REAYX has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to HLIEX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLIEX dropped -50.33% vs REAYX's -36.87%.

REAYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HLIEX and REAYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer