HLGEX vs. SEEGX
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth Fund (HLGEX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX).
HLGEX is managed by JPMorgan. It was launched on Mar 2, 1989. SEEGX is managed by JPMorgan. It was launched on Feb 28, 1992.
Performance
HLGEX vs. SEEGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HLGEX vs. SEEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLGEX JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth Fund | -5.79% | 8.65% | 22.80% | 23.11% | -27.08% | 10.67% | 48.33% | 39.73% | -5.07% | 29.51% |
SEEGX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund | -8.55% | 14.08% | 35.14% | 34.62% | -25.40% | 18.17% | 56.02% | 39.13% | 0.50% | 38.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HLGEX achieves a -5.79% return, which is significantly higher than SEEGX's -8.55% return. Over the past 10 years, HLGEX has underperformed SEEGX with an annualized return of 12.70%, while SEEGX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.94% annualized return.
HLGEX
- 1D
- 3.94%
- 1M
- -6.15%
- YTD
- -5.79%
- 6M
- -8.32%
- 1Y
- 11.90%
- 3Y*
- 12.84%
- 5Y*
- 3.94%
- 10Y*
- 12.70%
SEEGX
- 1D
- 3.47%
- 1M
- -4.89%
- YTD
- -8.55%
- 6M
- -10.48%
- 1Y
- 12.37%
- 3Y*
- 20.26%
- 5Y*
- 10.43%
- 10Y*
- 17.94%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HLGEX vs. SEEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HLGEX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than SEEGX's 0.69% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HLGEX vs. SEEGX — Risk / Return Rank
HLGEX
SEEGX
HLGEX vs. SEEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth Fund (HLGEX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HLGEX | SEEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.56 | 0.62 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.95 | 1.03 | -0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.14 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | 0.79 | +0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.75 | 2.40 | +0.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HLGEX | SEEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 | 0.62 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.52 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.83 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.55 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between HLGEX and SEEGX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HLGEX vs. SEEGX - Dividend Comparison
HLGEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.01%, less than SEEGX's 12.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLGEX JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth Fund | 10.01% | 9.43% | 14.70% | 0.00% | 0.79% | 8.87% | 10.61% | 7.29% | 7.26% | 6.41% | 0.04% | 5.32% |
SEEGX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund | 12.51% | 11.44% | 2.00% | 0.12% | 3.42% | 14.92% | 5.27% | 12.85% | 15.97% | 14.79% | 9.88% | 4.49% |
Drawdowns
HLGEX vs. SEEGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HLGEX drawdown since its inception was -57.65%, smaller than the maximum SEEGX drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLGEX and SEEGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HLGEX | SEEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.65% | -62.09% | +4.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.19% | -16.82% | +2.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.16% | -31.23% | -5.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.16% | -31.85% | -5.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.81% | -13.93% | +3.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.46% | -16.97% | +5.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 5.55% | -1.09% |
Volatility
HLGEX vs. SEEGX - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth Fund (HLGEX) has a higher volatility of 7.64% compared to JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX) at 6.47%. This indicates that HLGEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HLGEX | SEEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.64% | 6.47% | +1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.72% | 12.54% | +1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.08% | 21.14% | +1.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.32% | 20.26% | +2.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 21.57% | +0.33% |