HLGEX vs. CEMIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HLGEX (JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth Fund) and CEMIX (Causeway Emerging Markets Fund) are both mutual funds - HLGEX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by JPMorgan, while CEMIX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Causeway. Over the past 10 years, HLGEX returned 13.78%/yr vs 12.36%/yr for CEMIX. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HLGEX charges 0.89%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for CEMIX.

Performance

HLGEX vs. CEMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth Fund (HLGEX) and Causeway Emerging Markets Fund (CEMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLGEX achieves a 6.63% return, which is significantly lower than CEMIX's 36.68% return. Over the past 10 years, HLGEX has outperformed CEMIX with an annualized return of 13.78%, while CEMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.36% annualized return.

HLGEX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 4.71%
• YTD: 6.63%
• 6M: 4.87%
• 1Y: 12.43%
• 3Y*: 16.60%
• 5Y*: 6.87%
• 10Y*: 13.78%

CEMIX

• 1D: 0.97%
• 1M: 10.77%
• YTD: 36.68%
• 6M: 41.26%
• 1Y: 71.52%
• 3Y*: 32.96%
• 5Y*: 11.94%
• 10Y*: 12.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLGEX vs. CEMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HLGEX JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth Fund	6.63%	8.65%	22.80%	23.11%	-27.08%	10.67%	48.33%	39.73%	-5.07%	29.51%
CEMIX Causeway Emerging Markets Fund	36.68%	36.22%	14.90%	17.13%	-23.05%	-0.83%	16.95%	16.73%	-17.91%	39.79%

Correlation

The correlation between HLGEX and CEMIX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2007	0.64

The correlation between HLGEX and CEMIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (3 years) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HLGEX vs. CEMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLGEX

HLGEX Risk / Return Rank: 10
HLGEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
HLGEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
HLGEX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
HLGEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
HLGEX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

CEMIX

CEMIX Risk / Return Rank: 93
CEMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
CEMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
CEMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
CEMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
CEMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLGEX vs. CEMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth Fund (HLGEX) and Causeway Emerging Markets Fund (CEMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HLGEX	CEMIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	3.61	-2.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.20	4.42	-3.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.65	-0.51
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.96	5.31	-4.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.05	21.17	-18.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HLGEX vs. CEMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLGEX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the CEMIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLGEX and CEMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HLGEX	CEMIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78	3.61	-2.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31	0.68	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	0.67	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.33	+0.17

Drawdowns

HLGEX vs. CEMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLGEX drawdown since its inception was -57.65%, smaller than the maximum CEMIX drawdown of -68.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLGEX and CEMIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HLGEX	CEMIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.65%	-68.90%	+11.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.19%	-13.61%	-0.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.50%	-17.92%	-7.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.16%	-36.56%	-0.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.16%	-39.59%	+2.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.43%	-15.79%	+4.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.44%	3.40%	+1.04%

Volatility

HLGEX vs. CEMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth Fund (HLGEX) is 4.33%, while Causeway Emerging Markets Fund (CEMIX) has a volatility of 8.26%. This indicates that HLGEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HLGEX	CEMIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.33%	8.26%	-3.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.48%	17.06%	-3.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.37%	20.04%	-2.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.29%	17.69%	+4.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.97%	18.40%	+3.57%

HLGEX vs. CEMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLGEX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMIX's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

HLGEX vs. CEMIX - Dividend Comparison

HLGEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.84%, more than CEMIX's 1.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CEMIX Causeway Emerging Markets Fund	1.83%	2.49%	3.73%	4.85%	4.87%	23.35%	1.36%	2.03%	2.01%	1.58%	1.55%	1.69%
HLGEX JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth Fund	8.84%	9.43%	14.70%	0.00%	0.79%	8.87%	10.61%	7.29%	7.26%	6.41%	0.04%	5.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HLGEX and CEMIX in my portfolio?

HLGEX and CEMIX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HLGEX or CEMIX?

CEMIX has higher volatility (8.26%) compared to HLGEX (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLGEX dropped -57.65% vs CEMIX's -68.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CEMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.