HLFMX vs. GLLSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX) and abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX).
HLFMX is managed by Harding Loevner. It was launched on May 26, 2008. GLLSX is managed by Aberdeen. It was launched on Aug 29, 2000.
Performance
HLFMX vs. GLLSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HLFMX vs. GLLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLFMX Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund | -0.11% | 16.95% | 8.76% | 10.43% | -18.91% | 10.18% | 0.11% | 10.88% | -15.45% | 25.08% |
GLLSX abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | 8.83% | 34.81% | 0.73% | 21.35% | -23.04% | 36.50% | 15.93% | 23.64% | -11.50% | 23.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HLFMX achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly lower than GLLSX's 8.83% return. Over the past 10 years, HLFMX has underperformed GLLSX with an annualized return of 4.15%, while GLLSX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.92% annualized return.
HLFMX
- 1D
- 2.06%
- 1M
- -5.71%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 3.25%
- 1Y
- 15.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.57%
- 5Y*
- 4.87%
- 10Y*
- 4.15%
GLLSX
- 1D
- 3.18%
- 1M
- -10.26%
- YTD
- 8.83%
- 6M
- 18.55%
- 1Y
- 52.10%
- 3Y*
- 18.93%
- 5Y*
- 12.59%
- 10Y*
- 11.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HLFMX vs. GLLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HLFMX has a 1.60% expense ratio, which is higher than GLLSX's 1.23% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HLFMX vs. GLLSX — Risk / Return Rank
HLFMX
GLLSX
HLFMX vs. GLLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX) and abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HLFMX | GLLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.36 | 2.70 | -1.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.85 | 3.29 | -1.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.50 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 3.64 | -2.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.03 | 15.21 | -10.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HLFMX | GLLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 2.70 | -1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.73 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.69 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.57 | -0.50 |
Correlation
The correlation between HLFMX and GLLSX is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
HLFMX vs. GLLSX - Dividend Comparison
HLFMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than GLLSX's 1.72% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLFMX Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund | 3.57% | 3.56% | 1.88% | 1.77% | 2.28% | 0.83% | 1.61% | 1.97% | 1.34% | 1.90% | 1.01% | 1.13% |
GLLSX abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | 1.72% | 1.88% | 0.74% | 0.77% | 29.32% | 22.85% | 0.00% | 3.38% | 9.47% | 8.40% | 1.09% | 0.94% |
Drawdowns
HLFMX vs. GLLSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HLFMX drawdown since its inception was -63.95%, which is greater than GLLSX's maximum drawdown of -32.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLFMX and GLLSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HLFMX | GLLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.95% | -32.59% | -31.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.09% | -14.39% | +3.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.37% | -30.02% | +1.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.61% | -32.59% | -14.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.26% | -11.66% | +2.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.38% | -7.99% | -11.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 3.44% | -0.33% |
Volatility
HLFMX vs. GLLSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX) is 6.73%, while abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX) has a volatility of 11.43%. This indicates that HLFMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HLFMX | GLLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.73% | 11.43% | -4.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.72% | 15.86% | -7.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.03% | 19.71% | -7.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.23% | 17.27% | -7.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.79% | 17.37% | -5.58% |