HLFMX vs. FPADX
Compare and contrast key facts about Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX).
HLFMX is managed by Harding Loevner. It was launched on May 26, 2008. FPADX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 8, 2011.
Performance
HLFMX vs. FPADX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HLFMX vs. FPADX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLFMX Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund | -0.11% | 16.95% | 8.76% | 10.43% | -18.91% | 10.18% | 0.11% | 10.88% | -15.45% | 25.08% |
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund | 3.44% | 33.90% | 6.80% | 9.51% | -20.06% | -3.07% | 17.84% | 18.28% | -14.65% | 35.16% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HLFMX achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly lower than FPADX's 3.44% return. Over the past 10 years, HLFMX has underperformed FPADX with an annualized return of 4.15%, while FPADX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.85% annualized return.
HLFMX
- 1D
- 2.06%
- 1M
- -5.71%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 3.25%
- 1Y
- 15.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.57%
- 5Y*
- 4.87%
- 10Y*
- 4.15%
FPADX
- 1D
- 3.21%
- 1M
- -8.18%
- YTD
- 3.44%
- 6M
- 7.16%
- 1Y
- 32.67%
- 3Y*
- 15.83%
- 5Y*
- 3.78%
- 10Y*
- 7.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HLFMX vs. FPADX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HLFMX has a 1.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FPADX's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HLFMX vs. FPADX — Risk / Return Rank
HLFMX
FPADX
HLFMX vs. FPADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HLFMX | FPADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.36 | 1.88 | -0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.85 | 2.47 | -0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.36 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 2.47 | -1.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.03 | 9.85 | -4.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HLFMX | FPADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 1.88 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.23 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.45 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.28 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between HLFMX and FPADX is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
HLFMX vs. FPADX - Dividend Comparison
HLFMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than FPADX's 2.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLFMX Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund | 3.57% | 3.56% | 1.88% | 1.77% | 2.28% | 0.83% | 1.61% | 1.97% | 1.34% | 1.90% | 1.01% | 1.13% |
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund | 2.28% | 2.35% | 2.70% | 2.68% | 2.47% | 2.14% | 1.50% | 2.59% | 2.20% | 0.12% | 1.69% | 2.47% |
Drawdowns
HLFMX vs. FPADX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HLFMX drawdown since its inception was -63.95%, which is greater than FPADX's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLFMX and FPADX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HLFMX | FPADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.95% | -39.16% | -24.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.09% | -13.28% | +2.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.37% | -37.04% | +8.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.61% | -39.16% | -7.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.26% | -10.50% | +1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.38% | -13.39% | -5.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 3.33% | -0.22% |
Volatility
HLFMX vs. FPADX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX) is 6.73%, while Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) has a volatility of 9.56%. This indicates that HLFMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPADX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HLFMX | FPADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.73% | 9.56% | -2.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.72% | 13.61% | -4.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.03% | 17.83% | -5.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.23% | 16.70% | -6.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.79% | 17.63% | -5.84% |