PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLFMX vs. DEMCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HLFMX vs. DEMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX) and Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLFMX achieves a 6.49% return, which is significantly lower than DEMCX's 67.60% return. Over the past 10 years, HLFMX has underperformed DEMCX with an annualized return of 4.34%, while DEMCX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.80% annualized return.


HLFMX

1D
2.48%
1M
1.49%
6M
-2.06%
YTD
6.49%
1Y
12.21%
3Y*
10.91%
5Y*
5.18%
10Y*
4.34%
ALL TIME*
1.14%

DEMCX

1D
8.32%
1M
-18.28%
6M
33.85%
YTD
67.60%
1Y
153.43%
3Y*
49.76%
5Y*
21.94%
10Y*
16.80%
ALL TIME*
9.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

HLFMX vs. DEMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HLFMX
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund
6.49%16.95%8.76%10.43%-18.91%10.18%0.11%10.88%-15.45%25.08%
DEMCX
Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C
67.60%84.86%5.47%16.47%-29.38%-3.05%24.55%23.16%-17.94%40.59%

Correlation

The correlation between HLFMX and DEMCX is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2008

0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between HLFMX and DEMCX has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HLFMX vs. DEMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HLFMX
HLFMX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
HLFMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLFMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLFMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
HLFMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLFMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

DEMCX
DEMCX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DEMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
DEMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HLFMX vs. DEMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX) and Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HLFMXDEMCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.43

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.07

3.98

-2.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.64

16.56

-13.92

HLFMX vs. DEMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLFMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the DEMCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLFMX and DEMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HLFMX vs. DEMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLFMX drawdown since its inception was -63.95%, roughly equal to the maximum DEMCX drawdown of -63.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLFMX and DEMCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLFMXDEMCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.95%

-63.54%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.09%

-36.58%

+25.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.79%

-36.58%

+24.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.37%

-38.96%

+10.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.61%

-47.21%

+0.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.26%

-31.31%

+28.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.13%

-19.59%

+0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.49%

8.76%

-4.27%

Volatility

HLFMX vs. DEMCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX) is 3.50%, while Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX) has a volatility of 25.07%. This indicates that HLFMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DEMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLFMXDEMCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

25.07%

-21.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.02%

49.53%

-38.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.39%

52.91%

-40.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.67%

30.11%

-19.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.95%

25.79%

-13.84%

HLFMX vs. DEMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLFMX has a 1.60% expense ratio, which is lower than DEMCX's 2.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

HLFMX vs. DEMCX - Dividend Comparison

HLFMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, less than DEMCX's 12.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEMCX
Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C
12.22%20.47%1.09%2.03%0.69%2.58%0.61%0.00%0.00%1.03%0.08%0.00%
HLFMX
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund
3.35%3.56%1.88%1.77%2.28%0.83%1.61%1.97%1.34%1.90%1.01%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


HLFMX and DEMCX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DEMCX has higher volatility (25.07%) compared to HLFMX (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLFMX dropped -63.95% vs DEMCX's -63.54%.

DEMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HLFMX and DEMCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer