HLF.TO vs. T.TO
HLF.TO (High Liner Foods Incorporated) and T.TO (TELUS Corporation) are both stocks. HLF.TO operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while T.TO operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, HLF.TO returned 1.14%/yr vs 3.41%/yr for T.TO. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HLF.TO vs. T.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HLF.TO achieves a -0.48% return, which is significantly higher than T.TO's -3.36% return. Over the past 10 years, HLF.TO has underperformed T.TO with an annualized return of 1.14%, while T.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 3.41% annualized return.
HLF.TO
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 5.61%
- YTD
- -0.48%
- 6M
- 8.62%
- 1Y
- -14.90%
- 3Y*
- 4.15%
- 5Y*
- 5.70%
- 10Y*
- 1.14%
T.TO
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- YTD
- -3.36%
- 6M
- -4.07%
- 1Y
- -17.20%
- 3Y*
- -6.30%
- 5Y*
- -3.63%
- 10Y*
- 3.41%
HLF.TO vs. T.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLF.TO High Liner Foods Incorporated | -0.48% | -3.18% | 41.40% | -10.45% | -4.56% | 37.44% | 38.46% | 11.24% | -44.74% | -22.97% |
T.TO TELUS Corporation | -3.36% | 0.33% | -11.50% | -4.41% | -8.27% | 23.58% | 5.23% | 16.30% | -0.66% | 16.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between HLF.TO and T.TO is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 1989 | 0.05 |
Fundamentals
HLF.TO:
CA$419.52M
T.TO:
CA$26.69B
HLF.TO:
CA$0.99
T.TO:
CA$0.60
HLF.TO:
14.59
T.TO:
28.42
HLF.TO:
0.39
T.TO:
1.30
HLF.TO:
1.02
T.TO:
1.72
HLF.TO:
CA$1.09B
T.TO:
CA$20.32B
HLF.TO:
CA$206.83M
T.TO:
CA$8.88B
HLF.TO:
CA$83.65M
T.TO:
CA$7.49B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HLF.TO vs. T.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HLF.TO
T.TO
HLF.TO vs. T.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for High Liner Foods Incorporated (HLF.TO) and TELUS Corporation (T.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HLF.TO | T.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.82 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | -0.70 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | -1.26 | +0.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HLF.TO | T.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.58 | -1.03 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | -0.22 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 | 0.20 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.31 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
HLF.TO vs. T.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HLF.TO drawdown since its inception was -97.14%, which is greater than T.TO's maximum drawdown of -88.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLF.TO and T.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HLF.TO | T.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.14% | -88.00% | -9.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.71% | -24.60% | -5.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.96% | -24.60% | -5.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.69% | -38.60% | +3.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.96% | -38.60% | -38.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.59% | -35.51% | +12.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.03% | -17.15% | -36.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.43% | 13.69% | +3.74% |
Volatility
HLF.TO vs. T.TO - Volatility Comparison
High Liner Foods Incorporated (HLF.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to TELUS Corporation (T.TO) at 4.42%. This indicates that HLF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than T.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HLF.TO | T.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 4.42% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.16% | 13.45% | -0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.60% | 16.76% | +8.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.36% | 16.44% | +11.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.11% | 17.34% | +18.77% |
Dividends
HLF.TO vs. T.TO - Dividend Comparison
HLF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, less than T.TO's 9.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLF.TO High Liner Foods Incorporated | 4.83% | 4.63% | 3.88% | 4.57% | 3.12% | 2.08% | 1.98% | 3.58% | 7.57% | 3.81% | 2.61% | 2.99% |
T.TO TELUS Corporation | 9.76% | 9.13% | 7.98% | 6.17% | 5.19% | 4.26% | 4.70% | 4.48% | 4.64% | 4.14% | 4.30% | 4.39% |
Financials
HLF.TO vs. T.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between High Liner Foods Incorporated and TELUS Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HLF.TO vs. T.TO - Profitability Comparison
HLF.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, High Liner Foods Incorporated reported a gross profit of 63.27M and revenue of 329.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.2%.
T.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TELUS Corporation reported a gross profit of 824.00M and revenue of 4.99B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.5%.
HLF.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, High Liner Foods Incorporated reported an operating income of 21.33M and revenue of 329.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.5%.
T.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TELUS Corporation reported an operating income of 824.00M and revenue of 4.99B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.
HLF.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, High Liner Foods Incorporated reported a net income of 7.83M and revenue of 329.43M, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.
T.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TELUS Corporation reported a net income of 136.00M and revenue of 4.99B, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HLF.TO and T.TO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for HLF.TO and T.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer