HLF.TO vs. LIF.TO
HLF.TO (High Liner Foods Incorporated) and LIF.TO (Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corporation) are both stocks. HLF.TO operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while LIF.TO operates in Steel (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, HLF.TO returned 1.14%/yr vs 19.40%/yr for LIF.TO. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HLF.TO vs. LIF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HLF.TO achieves a -0.48% return, which is significantly higher than LIF.TO's -5.42% return. Over the past 10 years, HLF.TO has underperformed LIF.TO with an annualized return of 1.14%, while LIF.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.40% annualized return.
HLF.TO
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 5.61%
- YTD
- -0.48%
- 6M
- 8.62%
- 1Y
- -14.90%
- 3Y*
- 4.15%
- 5Y*
- 5.70%
- 10Y*
- 1.14%
LIF.TO
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- -5.42%
- 6M
- -5.85%
- 1Y
- 0.09%
- 3Y*
- 3.58%
- 5Y*
- -1.01%
- 10Y*
- 19.40%
HLF.TO vs. LIF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLF.TO High Liner Foods Incorporated | -0.48% | -3.18% | 41.40% | -10.45% | -4.56% | 37.44% | 38.46% | 11.24% | -44.74% | -22.97% |
LIF.TO Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corporation | -5.42% | 8.89% | 0.14% | 2.89% | -1.55% | 33.21% | 47.82% | 17.31% | -4.27% | 67.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between HLF.TO and LIF.TO is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 1996 | 0.07 |
The correlation between HLF.TO and LIF.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.13 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HLF.TO:
CA$419.52M
LIF.TO:
CA$1.79B
HLF.TO:
CA$0.99
LIF.TO:
CA$1.45
HLF.TO:
14.59
LIF.TO:
19.31
HLF.TO:
0.39
LIF.TO:
10.76
HLF.TO:
1.02
LIF.TO:
2.80
HLF.TO:
CA$1.09B
LIF.TO:
CA$165.74M
HLF.TO:
CA$206.83M
LIF.TO:
CA$159.74M
HLF.TO:
CA$83.65M
LIF.TO:
CA$93.44M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HLF.TO vs. LIF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HLF.TO
LIF.TO
HLF.TO vs. LIF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for High Liner Foods Incorporated (HLF.TO) and Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corporation (LIF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HLF.TO | LIF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.02 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | 0.01 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | 0.02 | -0.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HLF.TO | LIF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.58 | 0.00 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | -0.04 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 | 0.58 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.31 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
HLF.TO vs. LIF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HLF.TO drawdown since its inception was -97.14%, which is greater than LIF.TO's maximum drawdown of -76.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLF.TO and LIF.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HLF.TO | LIF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.14% | -76.24% | -20.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.71% | -14.38% | -15.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.96% | -16.63% | -13.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.69% | -46.48% | +11.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.96% | -57.86% | -19.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.59% | -22.03% | -0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.03% | -19.64% | -34.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.43% | 6.03% | +11.40% |
Volatility
HLF.TO vs. LIF.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for High Liner Foods Incorporated (HLF.TO) is 4.92%, while Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corporation (LIF.TO) has a volatility of 5.68%. This indicates that HLF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HLF.TO | LIF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 5.68% | -0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.16% | 16.40% | -3.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.60% | 19.56% | +6.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.36% | 28.30% | +0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.11% | 33.52% | +2.59% |
Dividends
HLF.TO vs. LIF.TO - Dividend Comparison
HLF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, which matches LIF.TO's 4.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLF.TO High Liner Foods Incorporated | 4.83% | 4.63% | 3.88% | 4.57% | 3.12% | 2.08% | 1.98% | 3.58% | 7.57% | 3.81% | 2.61% | 2.99% |
LIF.TO Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corporation | 4.83% | 5.19% | 10.37% | 7.99% | 9.23% | 15.99% | 9.35% | 16.25% | 7.22% | 9.74% | 5.37% | 10.43% |
Financials
HLF.TO vs. LIF.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between High Liner Foods Incorporated and Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HLF.TO vs. LIF.TO - Profitability Comparison
HLF.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, High Liner Foods Incorporated reported a gross profit of 63.27M and revenue of 329.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.2%.
LIF.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corporation reported a gross profit of 34.27M and revenue of 35.75M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.9%.
HLF.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, High Liner Foods Incorporated reported an operating income of 21.33M and revenue of 329.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.5%.
LIF.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corporation reported an operating income of 26.53M and revenue of 35.75M, resulting in an operating margin of 74.2%.
HLF.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, High Liner Foods Incorporated reported a net income of 7.83M and revenue of 329.43M, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.
LIF.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corporation reported a net income of 13.20M and revenue of 35.75M, resulting in a net margin of 36.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HLF.TO and LIF.TO have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for HLF.TO and LIF.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer