HLEMX vs. FQEMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Harding Loevner Emerging Markets Fund (HLEMX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX).
HLEMX is managed by Harding Loevner. It was launched on Nov 8, 1998. FQEMX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Nov 21, 2021.
Performance
HLEMX vs. FQEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HLEMX vs. FQEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLEMX Harding Loevner Emerging Markets Fund | 0.00% | -34.63% | 1.96% | 6.77% | -27.69% | -5.54% |
FQEMX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM | 8.67% | 55.98% | 6.67% | 12.18% | -20.68% | 0.32% |
Returns By Period
HLEMX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FQEMX
- 1D
- -1.71%
- 1M
- -18.93%
- YTD
- 8.67%
- 6M
- 25.16%
- 1Y
- 66.92%
- 3Y*
- 24.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HLEMX vs. FQEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HLEMX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FQEMX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HLEMX vs. FQEMX — Risk / Return Rank
HLEMX
FQEMX
HLEMX vs. FQEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harding Loevner Emerging Markets Fund (HLEMX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HLEMX | FQEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.58 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between HLEMX and FQEMX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HLEMX vs. FQEMX - Dividend Comparison
HLEMX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FQEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLEMX Harding Loevner Emerging Markets Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 16.56% | 3.13% | 8.75% | 8.53% | 0.32% | 1.40% | 0.89% | 0.73% | 0.60% | 0.56% |
FQEMX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM | 2.93% | 3.18% | 3.15% | 4.82% | 3.93% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HLEMX vs. FQEMX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HLEMX | FQEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -34.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -18.93% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -11.08% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.70% | — |
Volatility
HLEMX vs. FQEMX - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HLEMX | FQEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.61% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.97% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 24.01% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 19.68% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 19.68% | — |