HLEMX vs. FQEMX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HLEMX (Harding Loevner Emerging Markets Fund) and FQEMX (Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HLEMX charges 1.19%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FQEMX.

Performance

HLEMX vs. FQEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harding Loevner Emerging Markets Fund (HLEMX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

HLEMX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FQEMX

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 25.82%
• YTD: 90.46%
• 6M: 101.50%
• 1Y: 166.09%
• 3Y*: 48.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLEMX vs. FQEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HLEMX Harding Loevner Emerging Markets Fund	0.00%	26.25%	1.96%	6.77%	-27.69%	-5.54%
FQEMX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM	90.46%	55.98%	6.67%	12.18%	-20.68%	0.32%

Correlation

The correlation between HLEMX and FQEMX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2021	0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between HLEMX and FQEMX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

HLEMX vs. FQEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FQEMX

FQEMX Risk / Return Rank: 98
FQEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
FQEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
FQEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
FQEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FQEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLEMX vs. FQEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harding Loevner Emerging Markets Fund (HLEMX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HLEMX	FQEMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	6.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	1.21	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	HLEMX	FQEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-34.46%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-18.93%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	0.00%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-10.77%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.78%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HLEMX	FQEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	13.19%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	24.43%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	27.72%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	21.08%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	21.08%	—

HLEMX vs. FQEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLEMX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FQEMX's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

HLEMX vs. FQEMX - Dividend Comparison

HLEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 93.52%, more than FQEMX's 1.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FQEMX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM	1.67%	3.18%	3.15%	4.82%	3.93%	0.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HLEMX Harding Loevner Emerging Markets Fund	93.52%	93.52%	16.56%	3.13%	8.75%	8.53%	0.32%	1.40%	0.89%	0.73%	0.60%	0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HLEMX and FQEMX in my portfolio?

HLEMX and FQEMX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.