HKOR.L vs. UB20.L
HKOR.L (HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD) and UB20.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - HKOR.L tracks the MSCI Korea NR USD while UB20.L tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HKOR.L returned 17.54%/yr vs 8.18%/yr for UB20.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HKOR.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for UB20.L.
Performance
HKOR.L vs. UB20.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HKOR.L achieves a 106.23% return, which is significantly higher than UB20.L's 9.02% return. Over the past 10 years, HKOR.L has outperformed UB20.L with an annualized return of 17.54%, while UB20.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.18% annualized return.
HKOR.L
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- 8.32%
- YTD
- 106.23%
- 6M
- 116.74%
- 1Y
- 196.14%
- 3Y*
- 47.21%
- 5Y*
- 19.25%
- 10Y*
- 17.54%
UB20.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 9.02%
- 6M
- 8.55%
- 1Y
- 16.87%
- 3Y*
- 11.65%
- 5Y*
- 6.01%
- 10Y*
- 8.18%
HKOR.L vs. UB20.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HKOR.L HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD | 106.23% | 86.42% | -21.81% | 13.46% | -19.95% | -7.35% | 40.21% | 7.12% | -16.48% | 32.68% |
UB20.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 9.02% | 12.00% | 6.98% | -0.10% | 5.26% | 5.29% | 3.52% | 14.10% | -5.54% | 14.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between HKOR.L and UB20.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2012 | 0.64 |
The correlation between HKOR.L and UB20.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HKOR.L vs. UB20.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HKOR.L
UB20.L
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
HKOR.L
UB20.L
Industrials
HKOR.L
UB20.L
Financial Services
HKOR.L
UB20.L
Consumer Cyclical
HKOR.L
UB20.L
Healthcare
HKOR.L
UB20.L
Communication Services
HKOR.L
UB20.L
Basic Materials
HKOR.L
UB20.L
Consumer Defensive
HKOR.L
UB20.L
Energy
HKOR.L
UB20.L
Utilities
HKOR.L
UB20.L
Real Estate
HKOR.L
-
UB20.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HKOR.L vs. UB20.L — Risk / Return Rank
HKOR.L
UB20.L
HKOR.L vs. UB20.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD (HKOR.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB20.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HKOR.L | UB20.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.68 | 1.27 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.16 | 2.29 | +6.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.69 | 6.64 | +24.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HKOR.L vs. UB20.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HKOR.L drawdown since its inception was -55.33%, which is greater than UB20.L's maximum drawdown of -32.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HKOR.L and UB20.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HKOR.L | UB20.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.33% | -32.34% | -22.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.26% | -7.32% | -13.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.09% | -17.80% | -11.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.86% | -17.80% | -23.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.41% | -32.34% | -12.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.41% | -2.91% | -6.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.79% | -6.50% | -21.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.36% | 2.54% | +3.82% |
Volatility
HKOR.L vs. UB20.L - Volatility Comparison
HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD (HKOR.L) has a higher volatility of 18.97% compared to UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB20.L) at 3.80%. This indicates that HKOR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UB20.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HKOR.L | UB20.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.97% | 3.80% | +15.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.96% | 8.91% | +27.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.09% | 11.22% | +28.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.35% | 14.00% | +12.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.73% | 15.76% | +8.97% |
HKOR.L vs. UB20.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HKOR.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than UB20.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
HKOR.L vs. UB20.L - Dividend Comparison
HKOR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than UB20.L's 2.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HKOR.L HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD | 0.35% | 0.69% | 1.51% | 1.11% | 0.71% | 0.59% | 0.02% | 0.29% | 0.53% | 0.11% | 0.13% | 0.57% |
UB20.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 2.92% | 3.86% | 3.26% | 3.96% | 3.66% | 2.60% | 3.05% | 4.08% | 4.33% | 3.43% | 4.00% | 5.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HKOR.L and UB20.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UB20.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UB20.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HKOR.L.
HKOR.L tracks MSCI Korea NR USD, while UB20.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HKOR.L and 0.30% for UB20.L.
Find the right allocation for HKOR.L and UB20.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer