PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HKOR.L vs. IKOR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HKOR.L vs. IKOR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD (HKOR.L) and iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist) (IKOR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HKOR.L having a 107.38% return and IKOR.L slightly higher at 107.66%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HKOR.L having a 17.97% annualized return and IKOR.L not far behind at 17.90%.


HKOR.L

1D
-4.88%
1M
17.29%
YTD
107.38%
6M
126.00%
1Y
237.99%
3Y*
45.20%
5Y*
19.90%
10Y*
17.97%

IKOR.L

1D
-4.06%
1M
17.39%
YTD
107.66%
6M
126.31%
1Y
237.26%
3Y*
45.36%
5Y*
19.90%
10Y*
17.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HKOR.L vs. IKOR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HKOR.L
HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD
107.38%86.42%-21.81%13.46%-19.95%-7.35%40.21%7.12%-16.48%32.68%
IKOR.L
iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist)
107.66%85.96%-21.55%13.31%-19.76%-7.30%39.09%6.99%-16.57%32.45%

Correlation

The correlation between HKOR.L and IKOR.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2011

0.92

The correlation between HKOR.L and IKOR.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

HKOR.L vs. IKOR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HKOR.L
IKOR.L

Technology

59.7%
56.0%

Industrials

16.3%
18.8%

Financial Services

8.7%
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
5.7%

Healthcare

2.7%
3.0%

Communication Services

2.1%
2.6%

Basic Materials

1.7%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
1.4%

Energy

0.9%
1.1%

Utilities

0.3%
0.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

HKOR.L
59.7%
IKOR.L
56.0%

Industrials

HKOR.L
16.3%
IKOR.L
18.8%

Financial Services

HKOR.L
8.7%
IKOR.L
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

HKOR.L
6.3%
IKOR.L
5.7%

Healthcare

HKOR.L
2.7%
IKOR.L
3.0%

Communication Services

HKOR.L
2.1%
IKOR.L
2.6%

Basic Materials

HKOR.L
1.7%
IKOR.L
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

HKOR.L
1.2%
IKOR.L
1.4%

Energy

HKOR.L
0.9%
IKOR.L
1.1%

Utilities

HKOR.L
0.3%
IKOR.L
0.4%

Real Estate

HKOR.L

-

IKOR.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HKOR.L vs. IKOR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HKOR.L
HKOR.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
HKOR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HKOR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
HKOR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
HKOR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
HKOR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

IKOR.L
IKOR.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
IKOR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IKOR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IKOR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
IKOR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IKOR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HKOR.L vs. IKOR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD (HKOR.L) and iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist) (IKOR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HKOR.LIKOR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.84

1.83

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.12

10.97

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

39.48

39.06

+0.43

HKOR.L vs. IKOR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HKOR.L Sharpe Ratio is 6.39, which is comparable to the IKOR.L Sharpe Ratio of 6.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HKOR.L and IKOR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HKOR.LIKOR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.39

6.36

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.79

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.74

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.42

+0.09

Drawdowns

HKOR.L vs. IKOR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HKOR.L drawdown since its inception was -44.41%, smaller than the maximum IKOR.L drawdown of -61.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HKOR.L and IKOR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HKOR.LIKOR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.41%

-61.70%

+17.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.26%

-21.48%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.09%

-28.58%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.86%

-40.83%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.41%

-44.11%

-0.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.40%

-5.01%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.72%

-15.59%

-0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.00%

6.05%

-0.05%

Volatility

HKOR.L vs. IKOR.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD (HKOR.L) and iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist) (IKOR.L) have volatilities of 17.73% and 17.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HKOR.LIKOR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.73%

17.45%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.16%

32.34%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.01%

37.08%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.32%

25.31%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.24%

24.76%

-0.52%

HKOR.L vs. IKOR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HKOR.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than IKOR.L's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

HKOR.L vs. IKOR.L - Dividend Comparison

HKOR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than IKOR.L's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HKOR.L
HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD
0.35%0.69%1.51%1.11%0.71%0.59%0.02%0.29%0.53%0.11%0.13%0.57%
IKOR.L
iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.42%0.83%1.31%1.14%1.34%1.36%0.76%1.28%1.07%0.72%0.57%0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, HKOR.L and IKOR.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, HKOR.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HKOR.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IKOR.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI Korea NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HKOR.L and 0.74% for IKOR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HKOR.L and IKOR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer