HJPSX vs. BIAHX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

HJPSX (Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund) and BIAHX (Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund) are both mutual funds - HJPSX is a Japan Equities fund managed by Hennessy, while BIAHX is a Europe Equities fund managed by Brown Advisory. Over the past 10 years, HJPSX returned 10.43%/yr vs 12.16%/yr for BIAHX. Their 0.50 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HJPSX charges 1.57%/yr vs 1.19%/yr for BIAHX.

Performance

HJPSX vs. BIAHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund (HJPSX) and Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HJPSX achieves a 14.48% return, which is significantly higher than BIAHX's 4.03% return. Over the past 10 years, HJPSX has underperformed BIAHX with an annualized return of 10.43%, while BIAHX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.16% annualized return.

HJPSX

• 1D: -1.89%
• 1M: 0.04%
• 6M: 8.78%
• YTD: 14.48%
• 1Y: 23.76%
• 3Y*: 20.09%
• 5Y*: 8.14%
• 10Y*: 10.43%
• ALL TIME*: 9.26%

BIAHX

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: 2.37%
• 6M: -2.11%
• YTD: 4.03%
• 1Y: 11.96%
• 3Y*: 20.84%
• 5Y*: 12.30%
• 10Y*: 12.16%
• ALL TIME*: 9.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BIAHX Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
HJPSX Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

HJPSX vs. BIAHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HJPSX Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund	14.48%	29.02%	8.24%	16.30%	-16.35%	-4.64%	13.43%	19.97%	-12.56%	49.60%
BIAHX Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund	4.03%	47.26%	10.85%	19.36%	-11.95%	14.54%	11.34%	29.43%	-16.60%	32.37%

Correlation

The correlation between HJPSX and BIAHX is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.54
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2013	0.50

The correlation between HJPSX and BIAHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HJPSX vs. BIAHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HJPSX

HJPSX Risk / Return Rank: 43
HJPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
HJPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
HJPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
HJPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
HJPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

BIAHX

BIAHX Risk / Return Rank: 21
BIAHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
BIAHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
BIAHX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
BIAHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
BIAHX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HJPSX vs. BIAHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund (HJPSX) and Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HJPSX	BIAHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	0.87	+0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	1.36	+0.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.16	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.79	0.94	+0.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.28	2.47	+2.81

HJPSX vs. BIAHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HJPSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the BIAHX Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HJPSX and BIAHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HJPSX vs. BIAHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HJPSX drawdown since its inception was -47.91%, which is greater than BIAHX's maximum drawdown of -34.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HJPSX and BIAHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HJPSX	BIAHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.91%	-34.90%	-13.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.77%	-13.18%	-1.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.77%	-13.18%	-1.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.24%	-30.95%	-2.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.80%	-34.90%	+0.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.17%	-3.98%	+0.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.00%	-6.03%	-3.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.01%	5.01%	0.00%

Volatility

HJPSX vs. BIAHX - Volatility Comparison

Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund (HJPSX) has a higher volatility of 6.42% compared to Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX) at 4.23%. This indicates that HJPSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIAHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HJPSX	BIAHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.42%	4.23%	+2.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.58%	12.17%	+2.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.44%	14.21%	+4.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.47%	16.40%	+1.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.77%	16.89%	+0.88%

HJPSX vs. BIAHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HJPSX has a 1.57% expense ratio, which is higher than BIAHX's 1.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

HJPSX vs. BIAHX - Dividend Comparison

HJPSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.57%, more than BIAHX's 7.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIAHX Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund	7.31%	7.60%	5.16%	1.13%	2.66%	9.72%	6.39%	9.78%	12.12%	0.83%	1.19%	0.00%
HJPSX Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund	11.57%	13.25%	3.64%	0.85%	0.61%	0.43%	0.23%	1.30%	3.46%	2.09%	2.03%	3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HJPSX and BIAHX in my portfolio?

HJPSX and BIAHX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HJPSX or BIAHX?

HJPSX has higher volatility (6.42%) compared to BIAHX (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HJPSX dropped -47.91% vs BIAHX's -34.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HJPSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.