PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HJPNX vs. FIQLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HJPNX vs. FIQLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hennessy Japan Fund (HJPNX) and Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z (FIQLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HJPNX achieves a 20.44% return, which is significantly lower than FIQLX's 25.22% return.


HJPNX

1D
1.19%
1M
9.97%
YTD
20.44%
6M
20.50%
1Y
31.96%
3Y*
20.75%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
9.80%

FIQLX

1D
0.57%
1M
7.03%
YTD
25.22%
6M
24.65%
1Y
44.81%
3Y*
22.21%
5Y*
10.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HJPNX vs. FIQLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HJPNX
Hennessy Japan Fund
20.44%14.58%18.72%22.90%-30.65%-3.08%25.52%18.04%-8.43%
FIQLX
Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z
25.22%31.84%7.43%16.09%-22.16%3.32%25.58%25.93%-11.46%

Correlation

The correlation between HJPNX and FIQLX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018

0.91

The correlation between HJPNX and FIQLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HJPNX vs. FIQLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HJPNX
HJPNX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
HJPNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HJPNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
HJPNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
HJPNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
HJPNX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

FIQLX
FIQLX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FIQLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HJPNX vs. FIQLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Japan Fund (HJPNX) and Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z (FIQLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HJPNXFIQLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.38

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

3.55

-1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.80

13.55

-5.75

HJPNX vs. FIQLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HJPNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is lower than the FIQLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HJPNX and FIQLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HJPNXFIQLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45

2.14

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.52

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.59

-0.14

Drawdowns

HJPNX vs. FIQLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HJPNX drawdown since its inception was -59.65%, which is greater than FIQLX's maximum drawdown of -36.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HJPNX and FIQLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HJPNXFIQLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.65%

-36.13%

-23.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.18%

-12.73%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.06%

-19.14%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.72%

-36.13%

-8.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.08%

+1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.57%

-10.29%

-5.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.21%

3.33%

+0.88%

Volatility

HJPNX vs. FIQLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hennessy Japan Fund (HJPNX) is 4.26%, while Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z (FIQLX) has a volatility of 5.05%. This indicates that HJPNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIQLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HJPNXFIQLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

5.05%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.68%

16.33%

+0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.64%

21.13%

+1.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.00%

19.96%

+1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.80%

19.85%

-1.05%

HJPNX vs. FIQLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HJPNX has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than FIQLX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

HJPNX vs. FIQLX - Dividend Comparison

HJPNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.65%, more than FIQLX's 8.02% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIQLX
Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z
8.02%10.04%5.04%3.88%0.00%11.89%1.97%1.35%0.48%0.00%
HJPNX
Hennessy Japan Fund
10.65%12.83%5.80%5.87%0.00%0.89%0.00%0.13%0.04%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


HJPNX and FIQLX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIQLX has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to HJPNX (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HJPNX dropped -59.65% vs FIQLX's -36.13%.

FIQLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HJPNX and FIQLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer