HJEN vs. TAN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HJEN (Direxion Hydrogen ETF) and TAN (Invesco Solar ETF) are both Alternative Energy Equities funds - HJEN tracks the Indxx Hydrogen Economy Index - Benchmark TR Net while TAN tracks the MAC Global Solar Energy Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HJEN charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for TAN.

Performance

HJEN vs. TAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Hydrogen ETF (HJEN) and Invesco Solar ETF (TAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

HJEN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TAN

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 16.03%
• YTD: 43.40%
• 6M: 46.63%
• 1Y: 112.68%
• 3Y*: -0.45%
• 5Y*: -1.61%
• 10Y*: 13.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HJEN vs. TAN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HJEN Direxion Hydrogen ETF	0.00%	0.00%	-10.90%	-8.69%	-33.27%	-13.86%
TAN Invesco Solar ETF	43.40%	48.31%	-37.61%	-26.79%	-5.24%	-9.65%

Correlation

The correlation between HJEN and TAN is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2021	0.58

The correlation between HJEN and TAN shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (3 years) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HJEN vs. TAN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HJEN	TAN
Industrials	31.7%	3.3%
Basic Materials	9.2%	-
Energy	8.3%	57.3%
Technology	7.6%	9.7%
Financial Services	3.3%	3.6%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	22.1%

Return for Risk

HJEN vs. TAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAN

TAN Risk / Return Rank: 86
TAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
TAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
TAN Omega Ratio Rank: 75
TAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
TAN Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HJEN vs. TAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Hydrogen ETF (HJEN) and Invesco Solar ETF (TAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HJEN	TAN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.04	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	-0.12	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	HJEN	TAN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-95.29%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.62%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-64.40%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-73.95%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-78.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-67.65%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-78.51%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.62%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HJEN	TAN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.73%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	25.32%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	37.11%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	39.73%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	37.97%	—

HJEN vs. TAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

HJEN has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than TAN's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

HJEN vs. TAN - Dividend Comparison

Neither HJEN nor TAN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HJEN Direxion Hydrogen ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.91%	1.50%	1.24%	0.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TAN Invesco Solar ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.50%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.09%	0.30%	0.69%	1.77%	5.04%	1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HJEN and TAN in my portfolio?

HJEN and TAN have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HJEN or TAN?

On fees, HJEN is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HJEN or TAN?

HJEN is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for TAN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HJEN or TAN?

HJEN and TAN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between HJEN and TAN?

HJEN tracks Indxx Hydrogen Economy Index - Benchmark TR Net, while TAN tracks MAC Global Solar Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for HJEN and 0.69% for TAN.