PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIYY vs. MARO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIYY vs. MARO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax HIMS Option Income Strategy ETF (HIYY) and YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (MARO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIYY achieves a 2.11% return, which is significantly lower than MARO's 16.94% return.


HIYY

1D
-2.64%
1M
15.27%
6M
5.26%
YTD
2.11%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MARO

1D
-4.39%
1M
-4.28%
6M
7.45%
YTD
16.94%
1Y
-42.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIYY vs. MARO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HIYY and MARO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2025

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIYY vs. MARO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIYY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


MARO
MARO Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
MARO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MARO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
MARO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
MARO Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
MARO Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIYY vs. MARO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax HIMS Option Income Strategy ETF (HIYY) and YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (MARO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HIYYMARODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.04

HIYY vs. MARO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HIYY vs. MARO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIYY drawdown since its inception was -73.95%, roughly equal to the maximum MARO drawdown of -71.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIYY and MARO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIYYMARODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.95%

-71.75%

-2.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-65.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.79%

-55.44%

+13.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.76%

-42.61%

-1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.84%

Volatility

HIYY vs. MARO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIYYMARODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

82.75%

63.44%

+19.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.75%

65.64%

+17.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.75%

65.64%

+17.11%

HIYY vs. MARO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HIYY and MARO have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

HIYY vs. MARO - Dividend Comparison

HIYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 92.74%, less than MARO's 212.97% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


HIYY and MARO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HIYY and MARO have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

MARO has the higher dividend yield at 212.97%, compared with 92.74% for HIYY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIYY and MARO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer