PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIWS.L vs. WRDA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HIWS.L vs. WRDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI World Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Acc (HIWS.L) and UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HIWS.L vs. WRDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
HIWS.L
HSBC MSCI World Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Acc
1.03%13.05%7.89%
WRDA.L
UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc
-1.39%12.77%20.02%
Different Trading Currencies

HIWS.L is traded in GBP, while WRDA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the WRDA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIWS.L achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly higher than WRDA.L's -1.39% return.


HIWS.L

1D
2.08%
1M
-3.77%
YTD
1.03%
6M
6.42%
1Y
23.00%
3Y*
11.47%
5Y*
10Y*

WRDA.L

1D
1.76%
1M
-3.44%
YTD
-1.39%
6M
2.20%
1Y
16.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HIWS.L vs. WRDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIWS.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than WRDA.L's 0.06% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HIWS.L vs. WRDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIWS.L
HIWS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
HIWS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIWS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIWS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
HIWS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIWS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

WRDA.L
WRDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
WRDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
WRDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIWS.L vs. WRDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI World Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Acc (HIWS.L) and UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIWS.LWRDA.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.44

1.23

+0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.05

1.71

+0.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.25

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

2.59

+0.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.20

9.58

+1.61

HIWS.L vs. WRDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIWS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the WRDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIWS.L and WRDA.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIWS.LWRDA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

1.23

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

1.13

-0.31

Correlation

The correlation between HIWS.L and WRDA.L is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

HIWS.L vs. WRDA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HIWS.L nor WRDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

HIWS.L vs. WRDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIWS.L drawdown since its inception was -21.14%, which is greater than WRDA.L's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIWS.L and WRDA.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HIWS.LWRDA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.14%

-18.38%

-2.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.56%

-10.06%

+0.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.34%

-3.67%

-0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.88%

-2.41%

-0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

1.76%

+0.32%

Volatility

HIWS.L vs. WRDA.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC MSCI World Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Acc (HIWS.L) has a higher volatility of 5.03% compared to UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L) at 4.18%. This indicates that HIWS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WRDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HIWS.LWRDA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.03%

4.18%

+0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.06%

8.10%

+1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.94%

13.73%

+2.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.63%

12.54%

+1.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.63%

12.54%

+1.09%