PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIVE vs. CANG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HIVE vs. CANG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. (HIVE) and Cango Inc. (CANG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIVE achieves a 19.57% return, which is significantly higher than CANG's -88.10% return.


HIVE

1D
8.25%
1M
-27.58%
6M
-11.10%
YTD
19.57%
1Y
38.34%
3Y*
-16.66%
5Y*
-23.07%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-15.54%

CANG

1D
0.62%
1M
-6.05%
6M
-87.34%
YTD
-88.10%
1Y
-93.29%
3Y*
-33.24%
5Y*
-24.50%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-23.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIVE vs. CANG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HIVE
HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd.
19.57%-9.47%-37.09%214.58%-89.09%39.68%2,600.00%-64.10%-73.29%
CANG
Cango Inc.
-88.10%-31.82%331.37%-22.02%35.99%-50.19%-19.72%19.71%-36.48%

Correlation

The correlation between HIVE and CANG is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2018

0.18

The correlation between HIVE and CANG shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HIVE:

$825.02M

CANG:

$70.45M

EPS

HIVE:

-$0.31

CANG:

-CN¥11.07

PS Ratio

HIVE:

2.80

CANG:

0.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

HIVE:

$257.14M

CANG:

CN¥2.32B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HIVE:

$58.57M

CANG:

-CN¥783.34M

EBITDA (TTM)

HIVE:

$87.81M

CANG:

-CN¥1.82B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIVE vs. CANG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIVE
HIVE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
HIVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIVE Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
HIVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIVE Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

CANG
CANG Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
CANG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CANG Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
CANG Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
CANG Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
CANG Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIVE vs. CANG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. (HIVE) and Cango Inc. (CANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HIVECANGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

0.71

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.51

-1.00

+1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.78

-1.52

+2.30

HIVE vs. CANG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIVE Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is higher than the CANG Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIVE and CANG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HIVE vs. CANG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIVE drawdown since its inception was -97.73%, roughly equal to the maximum CANG drawdown of -95.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIVE and CANG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIVECANGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.73%

-95.56%

-2.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-74.86%

-93.55%

+18.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-77.10%

-95.56%

+18.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.61%

-95.56%

+0.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-88.50%

-95.54%

+7.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-78.65%

-60.24%

-18.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

49.02%

61.32%

-12.30%

Volatility

HIVE vs. CANG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. (HIVE) is 30.52%, while Cango Inc. (CANG) has a volatility of 57.45%. This indicates that HIVE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIVECANGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.52%

57.45%

-26.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

70.61%

100.23%

-29.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

97.95%

111.24%

-13.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

93.23%

85.52%

+7.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

109.08%

85.09%

+23.99%

Dividends

HIVE vs. CANG - Dividend Comparison

Neither HIVE nor CANG has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CANG
Cango Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%229.36%31.85%3.57%2.73%
HIVE
HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

HIVE vs. CANG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. and Cango Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
93.11M
702.01M
(HIVE) Total Revenue
(CANG) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. HIVE values in USD, CANG values in CNY

Frequently Asked Questions


HIVE and CANG have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CANG has higher volatility (57.45%) compared to HIVE (30.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIVE dropped -97.73% vs CANG's -95.56%.

HIVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.39 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIVE and CANG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer