CANG vs. KEEL
CANG (Cango Inc.) and KEEL (Keel Infrastructure Corporation) are both stocks. CANG operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while KEEL operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, CANG returned -24.03%/yr vs 7.65%/yr for KEEL. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CANG vs. KEEL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CANG achieves a -86.13% return, which is significantly lower than KEEL's 149.79% return.
CANG
- 1D
- -8.89%
- 1M
- -52.70%
- YTD
- -86.13%
- 6M
- -84.81%
- 1Y
- -90.43%
- 3Y*
- -28.94%
- 5Y*
- -24.03%
- 10Y*
- —
KEEL
- 1D
- -4.08%
- 1M
- 14.42%
- YTD
- 149.79%
- 6M
- 119.85%
- 1Y
- 632.29%
- 3Y*
- 62.03%
- 5Y*
- 7.65%
- 10Y*
- —
CANG vs. KEEL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CANG Cango Inc. | -86.13% | -31.82% | 331.37% | -22.02% | 35.99% | -50.19% | -19.72% | 19.71% | -22.46% |
KEEL Keel Infrastructure Corporation | 149.79% | 57.72% | -48.80% | 561.36% | -91.29% | 165.79% | 397.66% | -27.96% | -64.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between CANG and KEEL is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2018 | 0.16 |
The correlation between CANG and KEEL shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CANG:
$74.63M
KEEL:
$3.24B
CANG:
-CN¥10.61
KEEL:
-$0.51
CANG:
0.23
KEEL:
14.20
CANG:
0.35
KEEL:
5.78
CANG:
CN¥2.32B
KEEL:
$229.28M
CANG:
-CN¥783.34M
KEEL:
-$18.90M
CANG:
-CN¥1.82B
KEEL:
-$149.60M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CANG vs. KEEL — Risk / Return Rank
CANG
KEEL
CANG vs. KEEL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cango Inc. (CANG) and Keel Infrastructure Corporation (KEEL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CANG | KEEL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 1.51 | -0.76 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | 8.66 | -9.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.59 | 14.43 | -16.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CANG vs. KEEL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CANG drawdown since its inception was -95.25%, roughly equal to the maximum KEEL drawdown of -95.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CANG and KEEL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CANG | KEEL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.25% | -95.72% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -93.09% | -73.65% | -19.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -95.25% | -81.04% | -14.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.25% | -95.72% | +0.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.80% | -33.82% | -60.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.96% | -67.35% | +7.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 56.75% | 44.12% | +12.63% |
Volatility
CANG vs. KEEL - Volatility Comparison
Cango Inc. (CANG) has a higher volatility of 61.09% compared to Keel Infrastructure Corporation (KEEL) at 25.86%. This indicates that CANG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KEEL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CANG | KEEL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 61.09% | 25.86% | +35.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 103.54% | 69.27% | +34.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 111.77% | 110.36% | +1.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 85.49% | 104.93% | -19.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 85.26% | 290.48% | -205.22% |
Dividends
CANG vs. KEEL - Dividend Comparison
Neither CANG nor KEEL has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CANG Cango Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 229.36% | 31.85% | 3.57% | 2.73% |
KEEL Keel Infrastructure Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CANG vs. KEEL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cango Inc. and Keel Infrastructure Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CANG and KEEL have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CANG has higher volatility (61.09%) compared to KEEL (25.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CANG dropped -95.25% vs KEEL's -95.72%.
KEEL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.78 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CANG and KEEL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer