PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HISU-U.TO vs. QQC-F.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HISU-U.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Evolve US High Interest Savings Account Fund (HISU-U.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HISU-U.TO is traded in USD, while QQC-F.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the QQC-F.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HISU-U.TO achieves a 1.05% return, which is significantly lower than QQC-F.TO's 17.66% return.


HISU-U.TO

1D
0.01%
1M
0.20%
YTD
1.05%
6M
1.26%
1Y
2.76%
3Y*
3.38%
5Y*
10Y*

QQC-F.TO

1D
-0.59%
1M
6.35%
YTD
17.66%
6M
18.08%
1Y
34.79%
3Y*
24.89%
5Y*
12.99%
10Y*
19.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HISU-U.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HISU-U.TO
Evolve US High Interest Savings Account Fund
1.05%2.97%3.80%3.89%0.93%
QQC-F.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged
17.66%24.09%14.38%56.29%-14.74%

Correlation

The correlation between HISU-U.TO and QQC-F.TO is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2022

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HISU-U.TO vs. QQC-F.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HISU-U.TO
HISU-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
HISU-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HISU-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
HISU-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
HISU-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
HISU-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

QQC-F.TO
QQC-F.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
QQC-F.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HISU-U.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve US High Interest Savings Account Fund (HISU-U.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HISU-U.TOQQC-F.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+7.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

4.05

1.34

+2.71

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

31.52

2.41

+29.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

122.59

9.54

+113.05

HISU-U.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HISU-U.TO Sharpe Ratio is 7.76, which is higher than the QQC-F.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HISU-U.TO and QQC-F.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HISU-U.TOQQC-F.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.76

2.00

+5.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

8.23

0.68

+7.56

Drawdowns

HISU-U.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HISU-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.12%, smaller than the maximum QQC-F.TO drawdown of -41.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HISU-U.TO and QQC-F.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HISU-U.TOQQC-F.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.12%

-41.72%

+41.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.09%

-14.51%

+14.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.12%

-22.95%

+22.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-1.17%

+1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.01%

-7.47%

+7.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

3.66%

-3.64%

Volatility

HISU-U.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Evolve US High Interest Savings Account Fund (HISU-U.TO) is 0.10%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that HISU-U.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQC-F.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HISU-U.TOQQC-F.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.10%

4.75%

-4.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.23%

13.37%

-13.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36%

17.50%

-17.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.41%

25.66%

-25.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.41%

25.72%

-25.31%

HISU-U.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HISU-U.TO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QQC-F.TO's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HISU-U.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Dividend Comparison

HISU-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, while QQC-F.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HISU-U.TO
Evolve US High Interest Savings Account Fund
2.74%2.93%3.70%3.85%0.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQC-F.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged
0.00%0.09%0.50%0.57%0.89%0.66%0.49%0.64%0.77%0.66%0.81%0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


HISU-U.TO and QQC-F.TO have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HISU-U.TO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HISU-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QQC-F.TO.

HISU-U.TO is categorized as Money Market, while QQC-F.TO is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Evolve and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for HISU-U.TO and 0.20% for QQC-F.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HISU-U.TO and QQC-F.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer