HISU-U.TO vs. GOOG

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

HISU-U.TO (Evolve US High Interest Savings Account Fund) is Money Market fund actively managed by Evolve, while GOOG (Alphabet Inc) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, HISU-U.TO returned 4.65%/yr vs 41.44%/yr for GOOG. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

HISU-U.TO vs. GOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Evolve US High Interest Savings Account Fund (HISU-U.TO) and Alphabet Inc (GOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HISU-U.TO achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly lower than GOOG's 10.10% return.

HISU-U.TO

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 1.63%
• 6M: 1.70%
• 1Y: 3.79%
• 3Y*: 4.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GOOG

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -9.00%
• YTD: 10.10%
• 6M: 9.45%
• 1Y: 106.29%
• 3Y*: 41.44%
• 5Y*: 22.34%
• 10Y*: 26.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HISU-U.TO vs. GOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
HISU-U.TO Evolve US High Interest Savings Account Fund	1.63%	4.17%	5.24%	5.29%	1.25%
GOOG Alphabet Inc	10.10%	65.42%	35.62%	58.83%	-19.58%

Correlation

The correlation between HISU-U.TO and GOOG is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2022	-0.01

Return for Risk

HISU-U.TO vs. GOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HISU-U.TO

HISU-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 100
HISU-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
HISU-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
HISU-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 100
HISU-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
HISU-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100

GOOG

GOOG Risk / Return Rank: 96
GOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
GOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
GOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 96
GOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
GOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HISU-U.TO vs. GOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve US High Interest Savings Account Fund (HISU-U.TO) and Alphabet Inc (GOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HISU-U.TO	GOOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	20.00	3.68	+16.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	373.63	4.92	+368.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	373.89	1.60	+372.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	381.41	5.15	+376.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6,042.67	17.50	+6,025.17

HISU-U.TO vs. GOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HISU-U.TO Sharpe Ratio is 20.00, which is higher than the GOOG Sharpe Ratio of 3.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HISU-U.TO and GOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HISU-U.TO vs. GOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HISU-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum GOOG drawdown of -44.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HISU-U.TO and GOOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	HISU-U.TO	GOOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.03%	-44.60%	+44.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.01%	-20.75%	+20.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.03%	-29.35%	+29.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-44.60%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-13.48%	+13.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.00%	-8.90%	+8.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.00%	6.10%	-6.10%

Volatility

HISU-U.TO vs. GOOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Evolve US High Interest Savings Account Fund (HISU-U.TO) is 0.05%, while Alphabet Inc (GOOG) has a volatility of 9.63%. This indicates that HISU-U.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HISU-U.TO	GOOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.05%	9.63%	-9.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.12%	20.96%	-20.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19%	29.09%	-28.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.22%	31.31%	-31.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.22%	29.06%	-28.84%

Dividends

HISU-U.TO vs. GOOG - Dividend Comparison

HISU-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, more than GOOG's 0.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GOOG Alphabet Inc	0.25%	0.26%	0.32%	0.00%	0.00%
HISU-U.TO Evolve US High Interest Savings Account Fund	3.78%	4.10%	5.08%	5.20%	1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HISU-U.TO and GOOG in my portfolio?

HISU-U.TO and GOOG have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.