HISA.NEO vs. EASY.TO
HISA.NEO (Evolve High Interest Savings Account ETF) and EASY.TO (Evolve All-in-One UltraYield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HISA.NEO is a Money Market fund actively managed by Evolve, while EASY.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Evolve. Both are actively managed. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HISA.NEO vs. EASY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HISA.NEO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 0.80%
- 1Y
- 2.01%
- 3Y*
- 3.11%
- 5Y*
- 2.77%
- 10Y*
- —
EASY.TO
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HISA.NEO vs. EASY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HISA.NEO Evolve High Interest Savings Account ETF | 0.22% |
EASY.TO Evolve All-in-One UltraYield ETF | 6.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between HISA.NEO and EASY.TO is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2026 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HISA.NEO vs. EASY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HISA.NEO
EASY.TO
HISA.NEO vs. EASY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve High Interest Savings Account ETF (HISA.NEO) and Evolve All-in-One UltraYield ETF (EASY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HISA.NEO | EASY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 5.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 27.66 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HISA.NEO | EASY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.35 | 1.51 | +0.84 |
Drawdowns
HISA.NEO vs. EASY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HISA.NEO drawdown since its inception was -0.42%, smaller than the maximum EASY.TO drawdown of -8.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HISA.NEO and EASY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HISA.NEO | EASY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.42% | -8.20% | +7.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -2.88% | +2.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.01% | -2.01% | +2.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | — | — |
Volatility
HISA.NEO vs. EASY.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HISA.NEO | EASY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.03% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.08% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36% | 22.12% | -21.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.46% | 22.12% | -21.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.47% | 22.12% | -21.65% |
Dividends
HISA.NEO vs. EASY.TO - Dividend Comparison
HISA.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, less than EASY.TO's 6.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EASY.TO Evolve All-in-One UltraYield ETF | 6.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HISA.NEO Evolve High Interest Savings Account ETF | 2.27% | 2.32% | 3.65% | 4.60% | 2.22% | 0.52% | 0.84% | 0.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HISA.NEO and EASY.TO have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HISA.NEO is categorized as Money Market, while EASY.TO is Derivative Income.
Find the right allocation for HISA.NEO and EASY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer