EASY.TO vs. CNQE.TO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

EASY.TO (Evolve All-in-One UltraYield ETF) and CNQE.TO (Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

EASY.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve All-in-One UltraYield ETF (EASY.TO) and Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNQE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EASY.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 3.54%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CNQE.TO

• 1D: 2.95%
• 1M: 2.55%
• YTD: 36.84%
• 6M: 36.84%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EASY.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
EASY.TO Evolve All-in-One UltraYield ETF	7.50%
CNQE.TO Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF	-3.04%

Correlation

The correlation between EASY.TO and CNQE.TO is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2026	-0.40

Return for Risk

EASY.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve All-in-One UltraYield ETF (EASY.TO) and Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNQE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EASY.TO	CNQE.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.76	2.37	-0.61

Drawdowns

EASY.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EASY.TO drawdown since its inception was -8.20%, smaller than the maximum CNQE.TO drawdown of -18.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EASY.TO and CNQE.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EASY.TO	CNQE.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.20%	-18.22%	+10.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.25%	-7.77%	+5.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.96%	-4.11%	+2.15%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EASY.TO	CNQE.TO	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.06%	33.16%	-11.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.06%	33.16%	-11.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.06%	33.16%	-11.10%

Dividends

EASY.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Dividend Comparison

EASY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.24%, less than CNQE.TO's 9.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CNQE.TO Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF	9.57%	4.42%
EASY.TO Evolve All-in-One UltraYield ETF	6.24%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EASY.TO and CNQE.TO in my portfolio?

EASY.TO and CNQE.TO have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between EASY.TO and CNQE.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Evolve and Harvest.