PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIMZ vs. QQQY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HIMZ vs. QQQY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HIMZ vs. QQQY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIMZ achieves a -71.55% return, which is significantly lower than QQQY's -5.94% return.


HIMZ

1D
21.95%
1M
69.46%
YTD
-71.55%
6M
-92.53%
1Y
-88.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQY

1D
3.37%
1M
-4.31%
YTD
-5.94%
6M
-4.55%
1Y
14.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HIMZ vs. QQQY - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIMZ has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HIMZ vs. QQQY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIMZ
HIMZ Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
HIMZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIMZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIMZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
HIMZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIMZ Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQY
QQQY Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
QQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIMZ vs. QQQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIMZQQQYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.43

0.91

-1.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.02

1.16

-1.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.18

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.89

1.37

-2.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.25

4.58

-5.82

HIMZ vs. QQQY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIMZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the QQQY Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIMZ and QQQY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIMZQQQYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.43

0.91

-1.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.44

0.63

-1.06

Correlation

The correlation between HIMZ and QQQY is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

HIMZ vs. QQQY - Dividend Comparison

HIMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.59%, less than QQQY's 45.51% yield.


TTM202520242023
HIMZ
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF
8.59%2.44%0.00%0.00%
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
45.51%45.34%83.34%20.64%

Drawdowns

HIMZ vs. QQQY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIMZ drawdown since its inception was -98.18%, which is greater than QQQY's maximum drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMZ and QQQY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HIMZQQQYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.18%

-19.05%

-79.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-98.18%

-11.30%

-86.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.91%

-8.15%

-88.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.39%

-3.03%

-61.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

70.45%

3.37%

+67.08%

Volatility

HIMZ vs. QQQY - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) has a higher volatility of 79.45% compared to Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) at 6.28%. This indicates that HIMZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HIMZQQQYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

79.45%

6.28%

+73.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

127.80%

11.15%

+116.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

203.42%

16.42%

+187.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

203.86%

14.68%

+189.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

203.86%

14.68%

+189.18%