HIMZ vs. QQQY
HIMZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF) and QQQY (Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HIMZ is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while QQQY is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Defiance. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HIMZ returned -93.56% vs 36.38% for QQQY. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HIMZ charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for QQQY.
Performance
HIMZ vs. QQQY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIMZ achieves a -58.85% return, which is significantly lower than QQQY's 19.07% return.
HIMZ
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -7.54%
- YTD
- -58.85%
- 6M
- -69.67%
- 1Y
- -93.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQY
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 9.64%
- YTD
- 19.07%
- 6M
- 19.11%
- 1Y
- 36.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HIMZ vs. QQQY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HIMZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF | -58.85% | -65.21% |
QQQY Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF | 19.07% | 22.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIMZ and QQQY is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIMZ vs. QQQY — Risk / Return Rank
HIMZ
QQQY
HIMZ vs. QQQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HIMZ | QQQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.49 | -0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | 3.28 | -4.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.18 | 13.95 | -15.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HIMZ | QQQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.49 | 2.68 | -3.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.40 | 1.25 | -1.65 |
Drawdowns
HIMZ vs. QQQY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIMZ drawdown since its inception was -98.18%, which is greater than QQQY's maximum drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMZ and QQQY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIMZ | QQQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.18% | -19.05% | -79.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -98.04% | -11.14% | -86.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.53% | -0.36% | -95.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.90% | -2.91% | -65.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 79.15% | 2.61% | +76.54% |
Volatility
HIMZ vs. QQQY - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) has a higher volatility of 53.92% compared to Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) at 4.21%. This indicates that HIMZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIMZ | QQQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 53.92% | 4.21% | +49.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 131.06% | 11.30% | +119.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 191.74% | 13.67% | +178.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 200.34% | 14.75% | +185.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 200.34% | 14.75% | +185.59% |
HIMZ vs. QQQY - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIMZ has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIMZ vs. QQQY - Dividend Comparison
HIMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.94%, less than QQQY's 34.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HIMZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF | 5.94% | 2.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQY Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF | 34.34% | 45.34% | 83.34% | 20.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HIMZ and QQQY have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HIMZ has higher volatility (53.92%) compared to QQQY (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIMZ dropped -98.18% vs QQQY's -19.05%.
On 1-year performance, QQQY leads with 36.38% vs -93.56% for HIMZ. On fees, QQQY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, QQQY has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQY has performed better with a 36.38% return vs -93.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for HIMZ.
QQQY has the higher dividend yield at 34.34%, compared with 5.94% for HIMZ.
HIMZ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQY is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for HIMZ and 0.99% for QQQY.
QQQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HIMZ and QQQY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer