HIMZ vs. MULL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HIMZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HIMZ returned -93.56% vs 6074.28% for MULL. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HIMZ charges 1.31%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.

Performance

HIMZ vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIMZ achieves a -58.85% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 936.86% return.

HIMZ

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: -7.54%
• YTD: -58.85%
• 6M: -69.67%
• 1Y: -93.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MULL

• 1D: 2.92%
• 1M: 216.81%
• YTD: 936.86%
• 6M: 1,369.93%
• 1Y: 6,074.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIMZ vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HIMZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF	-58.85%	-65.21%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	936.86%	479.76%

Correlation

The correlation between HIMZ and MULL is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2025	0.30

HIMZ vs. MULL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HIMZ	MULL
Consumer Defensive	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	66.7%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

HIMZ vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIMZ

HIMZ Risk / Return Rank: 3
HIMZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
HIMZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
HIMZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4
HIMZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
HIMZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3

MULL

MULL Risk / Return Rank: 99
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 97
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIMZ vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HIMZ	MULL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.49	46.71	-47.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.60	7.02	-7.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.89	-0.96
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.96	116.34	-117.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.18	390.40	-391.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HIMZ vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIMZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is lower than the MULL Sharpe Ratio of 46.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIMZ and MULL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HIMZ	MULL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.49	46.71	-47.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.40	7.45	-7.85

Drawdowns

HIMZ vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIMZ drawdown since its inception was -98.18%, which is greater than MULL's maximum drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMZ and MULL.

Drawdown Indicators

	HIMZ	MULL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.18%	-72.29%	-25.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-98.04%	-53.09%	-44.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.53%	0.00%	-95.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-68.90%	-20.62%	-48.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	79.15%	15.79%	+63.36%

Volatility

HIMZ vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) have volatilities of 53.92% and 55.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HIMZ	MULL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	53.92%	55.41%	-1.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	131.06%	105.59%	+25.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	191.74%	132.38%	+59.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	200.34%	136.22%	+64.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	200.34%	136.22%	+64.12%

HIMZ vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIMZ has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

HIMZ vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

HIMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.94%, more than MULL's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
HIMZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF	5.94%	2.44%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	0.04%	0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HIMZ and MULL in my portfolio?

HIMZ and MULL have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HIMZ or MULL?

MULL has higher volatility (55.41%) compared to HIMZ (53.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIMZ dropped -98.18% vs MULL's -72.29%.

Which ETF is better, HIMZ or MULL?

On 1-year performance, MULL leads with 6074.28% vs -93.56% for HIMZ. On fees, HIMZ is cheaper at 1.31% per year. On volatility, HIMZ has been the lower-risk option at 53.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HIMZ or MULL?

Over the 1-year period, MULL has performed better with a 6074.28% return vs -93.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HIMZ or MULL?

HIMZ is cheaper with a 1.31% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HIMZ or MULL?

HIMZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.94%, compared with 0.04% for MULL.

What is the main difference between HIMZ and MULL?

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for HIMZ and 1.50% for MULL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (46.71 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.