HIMZ vs. BRKW

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) and Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW).

HIMZ and BRKW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HIMZ is an actively managed fund by Defiance. It was launched on Mar 12, 2025. BRKW is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Jun 17, 2025.

Performance

HIMZ vs. BRKW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) and Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HIMZ vs. BRKW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HIMZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF	-71.55%	-87.14%
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF	-6.47%	2.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIMZ achieves a -71.55% return, which is significantly lower than BRKW's -6.47% return.

HIMZ

• 1D: 21.95%
• 1M: 69.46%
• YTD: -71.55%
• 6M: -92.53%
• 1Y: -88.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BRKW

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: -6.49%
• YTD: -6.47%
• 6M: -7.62%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIMZ vs. BRKW - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIMZ has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than BRKW's 0.99% expense ratio.

HIMZ

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF

BRKW

Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF

Return for Risk

HIMZ vs. BRKW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIMZ

HIMZ Risk / Return Rank: 5
HIMZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
HIMZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
HIMZ Omega Ratio Rank: 10
HIMZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
HIMZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIMZ vs. BRKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) and Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HIMZ	BRKW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.43	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.02	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.25	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HIMZ	BRKW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.44	-0.32	-0.12

Correlation

The correlation between HIMZ and BRKW is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

HIMZ vs. BRKW - Dividend Comparison

HIMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.59%, less than BRKW's 20.90% yield.

	TTM	2025
HIMZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF	8.59%	2.44%
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF	20.90%	14.45%

Drawdowns

HIMZ vs. BRKW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIMZ drawdown since its inception was -98.18%, which is greater than BRKW's maximum drawdown of -11.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMZ and BRKW.

Drawdown Indicators

	HIMZ	BRKW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.18%	-11.86%	-86.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-98.18%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-96.91%	-9.45%	-87.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-64.39%	-4.26%	-60.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	70.45%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HIMZ	BRKW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	79.45%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	127.80%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	203.42%	17.95%	+185.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	203.86%	17.95%	+185.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	203.86%	17.95%	+185.91%