HIMZ vs. ABNG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HIMZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF) and ABNG (Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HIMZ charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ABNG.

Performance

HIMZ vs. ABNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) and Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF (ABNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIMZ achieves a -58.85% return, which is significantly lower than ABNG's -12.31% return.

HIMZ

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: -7.54%
• YTD: -58.85%
• 6M: -69.67%
• 1Y: -93.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ABNG

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: -8.78%
• YTD: -12.31%
• 6M: 10.42%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIMZ vs. ABNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HIMZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF	-58.85%	-22.64%
ABNG Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF	-12.31%	30.68%

Correlation

The correlation between HIMZ and ABNG is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	0.27

Return for Risk

HIMZ vs. ABNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIMZ

HIMZ Risk / Return Rank: 3
HIMZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
HIMZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
HIMZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4
HIMZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
HIMZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIMZ vs. ABNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) and Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF (ABNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HIMZ	ABNG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.49	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.60	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.96	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.18	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HIMZ	ABNG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.49	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.40	0.46	-0.86

Drawdowns

HIMZ vs. ABNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIMZ drawdown since its inception was -98.18%, which is greater than ABNG's maximum drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMZ and ABNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	HIMZ	ABNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.18%	-33.03%	-65.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-98.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.53%	-17.35%	-78.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-68.90%	-11.73%	-57.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	79.15%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HIMZ	ABNG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	53.92%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	131.06%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	191.74%	63.13%	+128.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	200.34%	63.13%	+137.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	200.34%	63.13%	+137.21%

HIMZ vs. ABNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIMZ has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than ABNG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

HIMZ vs. ABNG - Dividend Comparison

HIMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.94%, while ABNG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
ABNG Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
HIMZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF	5.94%	2.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HIMZ and ABNG in my portfolio?

HIMZ and ABNG have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HIMZ or ABNG?

On fees, ABNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HIMZ or ABNG?

ABNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for HIMZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HIMZ or ABNG?

HIMZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.94%, compared with 0.00% for ABNG.

What is the main difference between HIMZ and ABNG?

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for HIMZ and 0.75% for ABNG.