HIMU vs. SCYB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF (HIMU) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB).

HIMU and SCYB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HIMU is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Feb 7, 2025. SCYB is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. It was launched on Jul 10, 2023.

Performance

HIMU vs. SCYB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF (HIMU) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HIMU vs. SCYB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HIMU iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF	-0.62%	1.14%
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF	-0.47%	6.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIMU achieves a -0.62% return, which is significantly lower than SCYB's -0.47% return.

HIMU

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: -2.58%
• YTD: -0.62%
• 6M: 0.10%
• 1Y: 1.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCYB

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: -1.23%
• YTD: -0.47%
• 6M: 0.62%
• 1Y: 6.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIMU vs. SCYB - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIMU has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than SCYB's 0.03% expense ratio.

HIMU

iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF

SCYB

Schwab High Yield Bond ETF

Return for Risk

HIMU vs. SCYB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIMU

HIMU Risk / Return Rank: 19
HIMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
HIMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
HIMU Omega Ratio Rank: 19
HIMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
HIMU Martin Ratio Rank: 20

SCYB

SCYB Risk / Return Rank: 74
SCYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
SCYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
SCYB Omega Ratio Rank: 77
SCYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
SCYB Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIMU vs. SCYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF (HIMU) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HIMU	SCYB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.25	1.19	-0.94
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.38	1.75	-1.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.28	-0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.32	1.60	-1.28
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.07	8.44	-7.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HIMU vs. SCYB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIMU Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the SCYB Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIMU and SCYB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HIMU	SCYB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25	1.19	-0.94
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	1.62	-1.56

Correlation

The correlation between HIMU and SCYB is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

HIMU vs. SCYB - Dividend Comparison

HIMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%, less than SCYB's 7.01% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
HIMU iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF	5.23%	4.57%	0.00%	0.00%
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF	7.01%	6.99%	7.06%	3.36%

Drawdowns

HIMU vs. SCYB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIMU drawdown since its inception was -8.01%, which is greater than SCYB's maximum drawdown of -4.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMU and SCYB.

Drawdown Indicators

	HIMU	SCYB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.01%	-4.92%	-3.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.93%	-4.22%	-2.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.58%	-1.50%	-1.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.93%	-0.53%	-1.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.09%	0.80%	+1.29%

Volatility

HIMU vs. SCYB - Volatility Comparison

iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF (HIMU) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) have volatilities of 2.21% and 2.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HIMU	SCYB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.21%	2.25%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.87%	2.91%	-0.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.05%	5.67%	+2.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.79%	5.20%	+2.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.79%	5.20%	+2.59%