PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIMU vs. IROC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIMU vs. IROC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF (HIMU) and Invesco Rochester High Yield Municipal ETF (IROC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIMU achieves a 3.66% return, which is significantly higher than IROC's 3.13% return.


HIMU

1D
0.26%
1M
2.47%
YTD
3.66%
6M
3.75%
1Y
7.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IROC

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.57%
YTD
3.13%
6M
3.32%
1Y
7.02%
3Y*
5.05%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIMU vs. IROC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HIMU and IROC is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2025

0.61

The correlation between HIMU and IROC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIMU vs. IROC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIMU
HIMU Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
HIMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIMU Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
HIMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIMU Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

IROC
IROC Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
IROC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IROC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
IROC Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
IROC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
IROC Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIMU vs. IROC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF (HIMU) and Invesco Rochester High Yield Municipal ETF (IROC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HIMUIROCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.50

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

2.67

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.03

9.57

-2.54

HIMU vs. IROC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIMU Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the IROC Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIMU and IROC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HIMU vs. IROC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIMU drawdown since its inception was -8.01%, which is greater than IROC's maximum drawdown of -4.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMU and IROC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIMUIROCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.01%

-4.79%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.29%

-2.64%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.05%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.69%

-0.83%

-0.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

0.73%

+0.31%

Volatility

HIMU vs. IROC - Volatility Comparison

iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF (HIMU) has a higher volatility of 0.99% compared to Invesco Rochester High Yield Municipal ETF (IROC) at 0.80%. This indicates that HIMU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IROC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIMUIROCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

0.80%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.23%

2.38%

+0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.42%

3.02%

+1.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.31%

3.48%

+3.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.31%

3.48%

+3.83%

HIMU vs. IROC - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIMU has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than IROC's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIMU vs. IROC - Dividend Comparison

HIMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%, which matches IROC's 5.13% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
HIMU
iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF
5.10%4.57%0.00%0.00%
IROC
Invesco Rochester High Yield Municipal ETF
5.13%4.79%4.08%3.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIMU and IROC have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIMU has higher volatility (0.99%) compared to IROC (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIMU dropped -8.01% vs IROC's -4.79%.

On 1-year performance, HIMU leads with 7.32% vs 7.02% for IROC. On fees, IROC is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IROC has been the lower-risk option at 0.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HIMU has performed better with a 7.32% return vs 7.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IROC is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for HIMU.

IROC has the higher dividend yield at 5.13%, compared with 5.10% for HIMU.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for HIMU and 0.39% for IROC.

IROC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIMU and IROC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer