PortfoliosLab logo
HYMB vs. LEO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between HYMB and LEO is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

HYMB vs. LEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) and BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals, Inc. (LEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HYMB:

0.27

LEO:

0.21

Sortino Ratio

HYMB:

0.32

LEO:

0.27

Omega Ratio

HYMB:

1.05

LEO:

1.04

Calmar Ratio

HYMB:

0.18

LEO:

0.05

Martin Ratio

HYMB:

0.69

LEO:

0.32

Ulcer Index

HYMB:

2.23%

LEO:

5.22%

Daily Std Dev

HYMB:

6.71%

LEO:

11.39%

Max Drawdown

HYMB:

-29.57%

LEO:

-47.35%

Current Drawdown

HYMB:

-6.11%

LEO:

-27.79%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HYMB having a -1.96% return and LEO slightly higher at -1.93%. Over the past 10 years, HYMB has outperformed LEO with an annualized return of 2.54%, while LEO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.78% annualized return.


HYMB

YTD

-1.96%

1M

0.20%

6M

-3.71%

1Y

2.27%

3Y*

1.63%

5Y*

1.89%

10Y*

2.54%

LEO

YTD

-1.93%

1M

-1.04%

6M

-7.75%

1Y

2.00%

3Y*

-2.09%

5Y*

-0.75%

10Y*

1.78%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

HYMB vs. LEO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYMB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HYMB is 2525
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HYMB is 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HYMB is 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HYMB is 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HYMB is 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HYMB is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

LEO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LEO is 5151
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LEO is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LEO is 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LEO is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LEO is 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LEO is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HYMB vs. LEO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) and BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals, Inc. (LEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current HYMB Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is higher than the LEO Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYMB and LEO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

HYMB vs. LEO - Dividend Comparison

HYMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, more than LEO's 3.91% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
HYMB
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF
4.49%4.29%4.07%3.77%3.19%3.55%3.95%4.03%3.78%4.08%4.54%4.49%
LEO
BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals, Inc.
3.91%3.77%4.37%5.66%4.84%4.95%4.94%5.96%5.97%6.14%6.04%7.11%

Drawdowns

HYMB vs. LEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYMB drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, smaller than the maximum LEO drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYMB and LEO.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

HYMB vs. LEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) is 1.44%, while BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals, Inc. (LEO) has a volatility of 3.35%. This indicates that HYMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...