PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIMDX vs. HFMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIMDX vs. HFMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund Institutional Class (HIMDX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund (HFMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HIMDX having a 17.26% return and HFMDX slightly lower at 17.06%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HIMDX having a 14.68% annualized return and HFMDX not far behind at 14.27%.


HIMDX

1D
-0.18%
1M
3.15%
YTD
17.26%
6M
17.76%
1Y
28.09%
3Y*
24.74%
5Y*
16.60%
10Y*
14.68%

HFMDX

1D
-0.19%
1M
3.10%
YTD
17.06%
6M
17.55%
1Y
27.66%
3Y*
24.29%
5Y*
16.18%
10Y*
14.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIMDX vs. HFMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HIMDX
Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund Institutional Class
17.26%3.04%34.59%31.31%3.10%27.77%23.82%16.02%-23.18%21.17%
HFMDX
Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund
17.06%2.68%34.13%30.83%2.72%27.23%23.37%15.76%-23.52%20.71%

Correlation

The correlation between HIMDX and HFMDX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2009

1.00

The correlation between HIMDX and HFMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIMDX vs. HFMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIMDX
HIMDX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
HIMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
HIMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

HFMDX
HFMDX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
HFMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
HFMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIMDX vs. HFMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund Institutional Class (HIMDX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund (HFMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIMDXHFMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.24

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

2.31

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.96

7.79

+0.18

HIMDX vs. HFMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the HFMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIMDX and HFMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIMDXHFMDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

1.36

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.70

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.57

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.44

+0.21

Drawdowns

HIMDX vs. HFMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIMDX drawdown since its inception was -55.79%, smaller than the maximum HFMDX drawdown of -61.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMDX and HFMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIMDXHFMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.79%

-61.25%

+5.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.62%

-12.66%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.65%

-27.76%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.65%

-27.76%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.79%

-56.14%

+0.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.76%

-1.79%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.17%

-12.25%

+5.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.73%

3.75%

-0.02%

Volatility

HIMDX vs. HFMDX - Volatility Comparison

Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund Institutional Class (HIMDX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund (HFMDX) have volatilities of 6.32% and 6.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIMDXHFMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.32%

6.30%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.81%

15.83%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.47%

21.47%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.35%

23.36%

-0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.08%

25.09%

-0.01%

HIMDX vs. HFMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIMDX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than HFMDX's 1.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIMDX vs. HFMDX - Dividend Comparison

HIMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, more than HFMDX's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFMDX
Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund
0.61%0.72%18.84%9.61%21.66%1.73%0.00%0.00%40.95%18.56%0.64%0.91%
HIMDX
Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund Institutional Class
0.89%1.05%19.21%9.61%21.65%1.71%0.00%0.00%40.44%18.62%0.64%1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, HIMDX and HFMDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HIMDX has higher volatility (6.32%) compared to HFMDX (6.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIMDX dropped -55.79% vs HFMDX's -61.25%.

HIMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIMDX and HFMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer