HIMDX vs. ATGAX
HIMDX (Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund Institutional Class) and ATGAX (Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. HIMDX charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for ATGAX.
Performance
HIMDX vs. ATGAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HIMDX
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 3.15%
- YTD
- 17.26%
- 6M
- 17.76%
- 1Y
- 28.09%
- 3Y*
- 24.74%
- 5Y*
- 16.60%
- 10Y*
- 14.68%
ATGAX
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HIMDX vs. ATGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HIMDX Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund Institutional Class | -1.76% |
ATGAX Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund | 2.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIMDX and ATGAX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIMDX vs. ATGAX — Risk / Return Rank
HIMDX
ATGAX
HIMDX vs. ATGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund Institutional Class (HIMDX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HIMDX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.96 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HIMDX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 58.33 | -57.68 |
Drawdowns
HIMDX vs. ATGAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIMDX drawdown since its inception was -55.79%, which is greater than ATGAX's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMDX and ATGAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIMDX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.79% | 0.00% | -55.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.76% | 0.00% | -1.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.17% | 0.00% | -7.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.73% | — | — |
Volatility
HIMDX vs. ATGAX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIMDX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.32% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.47% | 9.26% | +12.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.35% | 9.26% | +14.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.08% | 9.26% | +15.82% |
HIMDX vs. ATGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIMDX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than ATGAX's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIMDX vs. ATGAX - Dividend Comparison
HIMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while ATGAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATGAX Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HIMDX Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund Institutional Class | 0.89% | 1.05% | 19.21% | 9.61% | 21.65% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 40.44% | 18.62% | 0.64% | 1.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, HIMDX and ATGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for HIMDX and ATGAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer