PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HILAX vs. FHLFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HILAX vs. FHLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford International Value Fund Class A (HILAX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HILAX having a 11.18% return and FHLFX slightly lower at 10.72%.


HILAX

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
11.18%
6M
11.24%
1Y
30.65%
3Y*
20.91%
5Y*
13.48%
10Y*
11.56%

FHLFX

1D
0.12%
1M
2.07%
YTD
10.72%
6M
10.36%
1Y
24.65%
3Y*
17.70%
5Y*
9.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HILAX vs. FHLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HILAX
Hartford International Value Fund Class A
11.18%44.31%0.11%19.55%-2.58%18.46%-6.29%17.94%-12.73%
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
10.72%31.96%3.67%18.16%-14.17%11.23%8.09%21.66%-10.70%

Correlation

The correlation between HILAX and FHLFX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.92

The correlation between HILAX and FHLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HILAX vs. FHLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HILAX
HILAX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
HILAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HILAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
HILAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
HILAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
HILAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

FHLFX
FHLFX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FHLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
FHLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HILAX vs. FHLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford International Value Fund Class A (HILAX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HILAXFHLFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.31

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

2.26

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.64

8.44

+2.19

HILAX vs. FHLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HILAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is higher than the FHLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HILAX and FHLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HILAX vs. FHLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HILAX drawdown since its inception was -48.61%, which is greater than FHLFX's maximum drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HILAX and FHLFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HILAXFHLFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.61%

-33.58%

-15.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.34%

-11.37%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.05%

-13.62%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.67%

-29.36%

+3.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

0.00%

-1.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.38%

-6.07%

-2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

3.03%

-0.11%

Volatility

HILAX vs. FHLFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford International Value Fund Class A (HILAX) is 3.86%, while Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that HILAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HILAXFHLFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

4.75%

-0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.37%

12.71%

-1.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.02%

15.27%

-1.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.17%

16.06%

-0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.00%

17.65%

-0.65%

HILAX vs. FHLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HILAX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLFX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

HILAX vs. FHLFX - Dividend Comparison

HILAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, more than FHLFX's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
3.13%3.46%2.98%2.86%2.60%2.47%1.92%1.95%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HILAX
Hartford International Value Fund Class A
5.21%5.80%0.00%2.52%2.66%3.03%1.18%2.83%8.06%6.75%4.86%3.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, HILAX and FHLFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHLFX has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to HILAX (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HILAX dropped -48.61% vs FHLFX's -33.58%.

HILAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HILAX and FHLFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer