PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIIFX vs. CLPAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIIFX vs. CLPAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catalyst/SMH High Income Fund (HIIFX) and Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund (CLPAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIIFX achieves a 2.92% return, which is significantly lower than CLPAX's 7.57% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HIIFX having a 7.06% annualized return and CLPAX not far behind at 7.01%.


HIIFX

1D
0.40%
1M
-1.31%
6M
2.00%
YTD
2.92%
1Y
13.42%
3Y*
11.30%
5Y*
5.37%
10Y*
7.06%
ALL TIME*
1.53%

CLPAX

1D
1.76%
1M
-3.34%
6M
6.47%
YTD
7.57%
1Y
15.02%
3Y*
12.20%
5Y*
5.95%
10Y*
7.01%
ALL TIME*
5.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

HIIFX vs. CLPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HIIFX
Catalyst/SMH High Income Fund
2.92%15.31%8.33%16.44%-13.48%8.03%10.00%8.36%-1.46%9.58%
CLPAX
Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund
7.57%12.32%11.42%35.92%-30.54%13.11%5.25%19.41%-3.65%8.20%

Correlation

The correlation between HIIFX and CLPAX is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.35

Over the past year, HIIFX and CLPAX have become more correlated (0.56) than their long-term average of 0.35, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIIFX vs. CLPAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HIIFX
HIIFX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
HIIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
HIIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

CLPAX
CLPAX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
CLPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
CLPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HIIFX vs. CLPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst/SMH High Income Fund (HIIFX) and Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund (CLPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HIIFXCLPAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.14

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

0.96

+1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.10

2.42

+5.68

HIIFX vs. CLPAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIIFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the CLPAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIIFX and CLPAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HIIFX vs. CLPAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIIFX drawdown since its inception was -51.29%, which is greater than CLPAX's maximum drawdown of -32.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIIFX and CLPAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIIFXCLPAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.29%

-32.47%

-18.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.89%

-12.87%

+7.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.46%

-18.37%

+9.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.58%

-32.47%

+13.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.58%

-32.47%

+13.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.55%

-8.58%

+7.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.14%

-8.04%

-7.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.48%

5.09%

-3.61%

Volatility

HIIFX vs. CLPAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Catalyst/SMH High Income Fund (HIIFX) is 1.64%, while Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund (CLPAX) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that HIIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIIFXCLPAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.64%

4.33%

-2.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.54%

12.12%

-7.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.65%

15.44%

-8.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.53%

16.16%

-9.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.93%

14.55%

-8.62%

HIIFX vs. CLPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIIFX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CLPAX's 1.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIIFX vs. CLPAX - Dividend Comparison

HIIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.93%, less than CLPAX's 8.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLPAX
Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund
8.46%9.10%0.00%0.00%2.68%0.32%0.49%5.41%0.30%0.02%0.00%17.26%
HIIFX
Catalyst/SMH High Income Fund
5.93%4.65%6.03%6.55%6.64%4.03%5.00%5.37%5.61%5.50%6.81%12.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIIFX and CLPAX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLPAX has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to HIIFX (1.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIIFX dropped -51.29% vs CLPAX's -32.47%.

HIIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIIFX and CLPAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer