PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIGH vs. ARMW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIGH vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIGH achieves a -0.38% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 363.23% return.


HIGH

1D
-0.32%
1M
1.63%
YTD
-0.38%
6M
-1.48%
1Y
-3.46%
3Y*
3.02%
5Y*
10Y*

ARMW

1D
3.44%
1M
128.75%
YTD
363.23%
6M
245.13%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIGH vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HIGH
Simplify Enhanced Income ETF
-0.38%-1.62%
ARMW
Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF
363.23%-40.49%

Correlation

The correlation between HIGH and ARMW is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025

0.39

HIGH vs. ARMW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HIGH
ARMW

Financial Services

71.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

36.0%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

HIGH
71.3%
ARMW

-

Basic Materials

HIGH

-

ARMW

-

Communication Services

HIGH

-

ARMW

-

Consumer Cyclical

HIGH

-

ARMW

-

Consumer Defensive

HIGH

-

ARMW

-

Energy

HIGH

-

ARMW

-

Healthcare

HIGH

-

ARMW

-

Industrials

HIGH

-

ARMW

-

Real Estate

HIGH

-

ARMW

-

Technology

HIGH

-

ARMW
36.0%

Utilities

HIGH

-

ARMW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIGH vs. ARMW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIGH
HIGH Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
HIGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIGH Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
HIGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIGH Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

ARMW
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIGH vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIGHARMWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.53

HIGH vs. ARMW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIGHARMWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

4.96

-4.57

Drawdowns

HIGH vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIGH drawdown since its inception was -9.50%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIGH and ARMW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIGHARMWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.50%

-48.47%

+38.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.11%

0.00%

-7.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.37%

-26.55%

+24.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.53%

Volatility

HIGH vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIGHARMWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.83%

88.46%

-79.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.56%

88.46%

-78.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.56%

88.46%

-78.90%

HIGH vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIGH has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIGH vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison

HIGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.33%, less than ARMW's 15.20% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
ARMW
Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF
15.20%16.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HIGH
Simplify Enhanced Income ETF
7.33%7.71%8.34%9.40%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIGH and ARMW have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HIGH is cheaper at 0.51% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HIGH is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.

ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 15.20%, compared with 7.33% for HIGH.

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for HIGH and 0.99% for ARMW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIGH and ARMW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer