PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIGH.L vs. AMEM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIGH.L vs. AMEM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (HIGH.L) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR (AMEM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIGH.L achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly lower than AMEM.DE's 20.68% return.


HIGH.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.00%
6M
1.45%
YTD
1.29%
1Y
3.11%
3Y*
6.20%
5Y*
2.73%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.65%

AMEM.DE

1D
1.23%
1M
-8.29%
6M
12.96%
YTD
20.68%
1Y
35.22%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
7.63%
10Y*
8.29%
ALL TIME*
6.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIGH.L vs. AMEM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HIGH.L
iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
1.29%4.89%5.70%11.59%-9.32%2.82%1.10%9.76%-3.41%0.63%
AMEM.DE
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR
20.68%19.22%13.69%5.35%-13.83%3.96%6.43%21.24%-11.00%4.76%

Correlation

The correlation between HIGH.L and AMEM.DE is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2017

0.47

The correlation between HIGH.L and AMEM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIGH.L vs. AMEM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIGH.L
HIGH.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
HIGH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIGH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIGH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
HIGH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIGH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

AMEM.DE
AMEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
AMEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
AMEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIGH.L vs. AMEM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (HIGH.L) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR (AMEM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HIGH.LAMEM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.32

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

3.17

-2.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.35

9.65

-5.30

HIGH.L vs. AMEM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIGH.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the AMEM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIGH.L and AMEM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HIGH.L vs. AMEM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIGH.L drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, smaller than the maximum AMEM.DE drawdown of -35.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIGH.L and AMEM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIGH.LAMEM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.42%

-35.91%

+10.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.88%

-11.06%

+8.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.65%

-19.20%

+15.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.64%

-22.67%

+8.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-9.96%

+9.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.68%

-10.19%

+7.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

3.64%

-2.93%

Volatility

HIGH.L vs. AMEM.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (HIGH.L) is 0.73%, while Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR (AMEM.DE) has a volatility of 8.54%. This indicates that HIGH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMEM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIGH.LAMEM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

8.54%

-7.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.12%

17.72%

-14.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.67%

20.15%

-16.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.47%

17.27%

-11.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.16%

18.48%

-11.32%

HIGH.L vs. AMEM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIGH.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AMEM.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIGH.L vs. AMEM.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither HIGH.L nor AMEM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HIGH.L and AMEM.DE have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AMEM.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMEM.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HIGH.L.

HIGH.L is categorized as European High Yield Bonds, while AMEM.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. HIGH.L tracks Bloomberg Pan Euro HY Euro TR EUR, while AMEM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HIGH.L and 0.20% for AMEM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIGH.L and AMEM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer