HIEMX vs. DRESX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HIEMX (Virtus Vontobel Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund) and DRESX (Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 10 years, HIEMX returned 0.96%/yr vs 11.45%/yr for DRESX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 1.24% expense ratio.

Performance

HIEMX vs. DRESX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Vontobel Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (HIEMX) and Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (DRESX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIEMX achieves a -9.33% return, which is significantly lower than DRESX's 19.28% return. Over the past 10 years, HIEMX has underperformed DRESX with an annualized return of 0.96%, while DRESX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.45% annualized return.

HIEMX

• 1D: -1.66%
• 1M: -1.79%
• YTD: -9.33%
• 6M: -9.95%
• 1Y: -3.50%
• 3Y*: 0.41%
• 5Y*: -7.20%
• 10Y*: 0.96%

DRESX

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: -4.51%
• YTD: 19.28%
• 6M: 21.41%
• 1Y: 40.79%
• 3Y*: 21.73%
• 5Y*: 9.03%
• 10Y*: 11.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIEMX vs. DRESX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HIEMX Virtus Vontobel Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund	-9.33%	21.39%	-8.26%	0.39%	-23.26%	-6.34%	15.71%	18.35%	-14.37%	34.47%
DRESX Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund	19.28%	24.08%	14.86%	10.30%	-21.17%	15.93%	33.56%	33.70%	-24.00%	33.30%

Correlation

The correlation between HIEMX and DRESX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2011	0.69

The correlation between HIEMX and DRESX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.73 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HIEMX vs. DRESX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIEMX

HIEMX Risk / Return Rank: 2
HIEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
HIEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
HIEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
HIEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
HIEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

DRESX

DRESX Risk / Return Rank: 78
DRESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
DRESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
DRESX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
DRESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
DRESX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIEMX vs. DRESX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Vontobel Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (HIEMX) and Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (DRESX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HIEMX	DRESX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.21	2.68	-2.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.19	3.64	-3.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.50	-0.52
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.18	4.06	-4.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.46	13.31	-13.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HIEMX vs. DRESX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIEMX Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the DRESX Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIEMX and DRESX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HIEMX	DRESX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21	2.68	-2.89
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.47	0.62	-1.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.06	0.72	-0.66
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.59	-0.34

Drawdowns

HIEMX vs. DRESX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIEMX drawdown since its inception was -58.48%, which is greater than DRESX's maximum drawdown of -33.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIEMX and DRESX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HIEMX	DRESX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.48%	-33.38%	-25.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.19%	-10.16%	-7.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.39%	-17.65%	+0.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.08%	-25.88%	-15.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.22%	-33.38%	-10.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.84%	-5.91%	-28.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.62%	-9.90%	-7.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.62%	3.09%	+3.53%

Volatility

HIEMX vs. DRESX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Vontobel Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (HIEMX) is 4.42%, while Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (DRESX) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that HIEMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRESX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HIEMX	DRESX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.42%	6.07%	-1.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.80%	13.05%	-1.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.55%	15.38%	-0.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.43%	14.71%	+0.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.17%	15.90%	+0.27%

HIEMX vs. DRESX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HIEMX and DRESX have an expense ratio of 1.24%.

Dividends

HIEMX vs. DRESX - Dividend Comparison

HIEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than DRESX's 1.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DRESX Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund	1.88%	2.25%	0.68%	1.09%	0.00%	0.04%	0.65%	0.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HIEMX Virtus Vontobel Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund	2.08%	1.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	23.24%	0.63%	2.05%	3.83%	0.70%	0.44%	0.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HIEMX and DRESX in my portfolio?

HIEMX and DRESX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HIEMX or DRESX?

DRESX has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to HIEMX (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIEMX dropped -58.48% vs DRESX's -33.38%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DRESX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.