HIDV vs. ELCV
HIDV (AB US High Dividend ETF) and ELCV (Eventide High Dividend ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HIDV returned 29.26% vs 32.68% for ELCV. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HIDV charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ELCV.
Performance
HIDV vs. ELCV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIDV achieves a 11.35% return, which is significantly lower than ELCV's 21.94% return.
HIDV
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 4.19%
- YTD
- 11.35%
- 6M
- 12.26%
- 1Y
- 29.26%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ELCV
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 3.96%
- YTD
- 21.94%
- 6M
- 20.29%
- 1Y
- 32.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HIDV vs. ELCV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HIDV AB US High Dividend ETF | 11.35% | 14.64% | 3.07% |
ELCV Eventide High Dividend ETF | 21.94% | 9.96% | -1.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIDV and ELCV is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024 | 0.70 |
The correlation between HIDV and ELCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIDV vs. ELCV — Risk / Return Rank
HIDV
ELCV
HIDV vs. ELCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) and Eventide High Dividend ETF (ELCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HIDV | ELCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.51 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | 6.50 | -3.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.38 | 23.06 | -9.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HIDV | ELCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47 | 2.87 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.63 | 1.17 | +0.46 |
Drawdowns
HIDV vs. ELCV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIDV drawdown since its inception was -18.76%, roughly equal to the maximum ELCV drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIDV and ELCV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIDV | ELCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.76% | -18.38% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.57% | -5.05% | -4.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | 0.00% | -0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.05% | -3.74% | +1.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 1.42% | +0.77% |
Volatility
HIDV vs. ELCV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) is 2.88%, while Eventide High Dividend ETF (ELCV) has a volatility of 3.56%. This indicates that HIDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ELCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIDV | ELCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.88% | 3.56% | -0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.03% | 8.74% | +0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.90% | 11.47% | +0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 15.36% | -0.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 15.36% | -0.85% |
HIDV vs. ELCV - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIDV has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than ELCV's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIDV vs. ELCV - Dividend Comparison
HIDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than ELCV's 1.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ELCV Eventide High Dividend ETF | 1.75% | 2.34% | 0.29% | 0.00% |
HIDV AB US High Dividend ETF | 2.26% | 2.22% | 2.29% | 2.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HIDV and ELCV have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ELCV has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to HIDV (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIDV dropped -18.76% vs ELCV's -18.38%.
On 1-year performance, ELCV leads with 32.68% vs 29.26% for HIDV. On fees, HIDV is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, HIDV has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ELCV has performed better with a 32.68% return vs 29.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HIDV is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ELCV.
HIDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.26%, compared with 1.75% for ELCV.
They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and Eventide. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for HIDV and 0.49% for ELCV.
ELCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HIDV and ELCV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer